Follow this authorErik Wemple's opinions

Publication of the note rounds out the picture of a magazine in panic mode, cleaved by the most divisive conflict on the world stage and discovering how far it can venture from the orthodoxy of its core audience. Answer: not far at all. Guernica may be a small, niche publication, but its struggles here are universal because every other media outlet is agonizing over how to write about Israel-Gaza, who’s qualified to write about it and precisely what context gets loaded into the mix. Err on one side or the other, and your publication could be facing an X revolt, a staff revolt or some other crisis. This a conflict, after all, in which proportional polemic responses are becoming extinct.

Whereas the Guernica masthead in January listed about 50 people, it now lists about a dozen, thanks at least in part to staff dismay over Chen’s essay. Some staffers wrote impassioned posts on X outlining their rationales for turning in their passcodes. They left behind a labor of love: Guernica is run entirely by volunteers. Jina Moore Ngarambe, who took over as editor in chief in 2021, resigned her post on April 5: “The magazine stands by its retraction of the work; I do not. Guernica will continue, but I am no longer the right leader for its work,” wrote Ngarambe.

Advertisement

The idea behind the essay, Chen tells me, was to write something that “didn’t step away from the horrors of war but that offered an honest and nuanced perspective.” Ngarambe edited the story, which discussed the difficulty of Chen’s transition to life in Israel, her refusal to enlist in the Israeli military, her reaction to the Hamas attack on Oct. 7, among other experiences. A theme of the essay is Chen’s sense of duty — she gives blood, participates in a volunteer program called Road to Recovery that transports Palestinian children from the West Bank to Israeli hospitals, and assists a Jewish family reeling from Oct. 7. “Their daughter, son-in-law, and nephew had been murdered,” Chen writes. “Their house had been torched, and they were evacuated to my village, where they were temporarily living at the end of my street.”

It all took a toll: “My own heart was in turmoil,” writes Chen. “It is not easy to tread the line of empathy, to feel passion for both sides. But as the days went by, the shock turned into a dull pain in my heart and a heaviness in my legs.”

“Both sides,” huh? Those are fighting words for thinkers in a certain precinct of American thought. As it happened, some of the toughest commentary came from Guernica staffers. In a resignation note posted to X, senior nonfiction editor April Zhu commended Guernica’s “interiority,” which means that the magazine’s writing proceeds from shared beliefs and principles. “To wrestle with universal humanity across the gap of apartheid — which, by definition, distributes humanity unequally — without calling for its obliteration is to violate the precious ‘shared interiority’ that set Guernica apart,” wrote Zhu, in a polemic that doubles as an accounting as to why literary magazines don’t get more readers.

Advertisement

Another departing staffer wrote, “I’ve drawn profound meaning from the stated direction that what constitutes a Guernica piece is resistance to imperialism. This essay documents uncritically how one yields to it.” And another:

It’s not the time for handwringing, two-state “empathy.” I resign @GuernicaMag Free Palestine 🇵🇸

Amid the resignations and denunciations, a note on the Guernica site — from “admin” — said,........

© Washington Post