Human beings need to belong. From our earliest cave-dwelling ancestors, membership in a clan or tribe was a requirement for survival. Group membership provided safety, resources, and shared knowledge.

While physical survival in the 21st century is much less dependent on group affiliation, the psychological mechanisms driving clustering into "in-groups" and "out-groups" persist. Distinctions between and within groups shape social behavior, influence identity, fuel intragroup collaboration, and power intergroup conflict. Social psychology, evolutionary theory, and cognitive neuroscience have insights into in-group and out-group dynamics.

Understanding that other people have “intentions, desires, beliefs, perceptions, and emotions” that differ from ours is a key step to building empathy and relationships. (You can read more about "Theory of Mind" here.)

The division between in-groups and out-groups is a process of categorization, a fundamental cognitive function. We classify plants as edible or poisonous, tools as useful or broken, and people as friends or foes.

Social identity theory, introduced by Henri Tajfel, posits that individuals derive a sense of self from group affiliation. Group memberships form part of a person’s social identity, influencing self-esteem and providing a framework for understanding the world.

One of the central tenets of social identity theory is that we strive for positive distinctiveness. Differentiation fosters feelings of cohesion within the in-group and exclusion toward the out-group. We bolster the status of our in-group by favorably comparing them to out-groups. Out-groups are often perceived as being inferior or threatening. For example, “My group is refined. Yours is coarse or common.” Or, “My group is hardworking. Your group is lazy.”

Marking my group with badges of distinction enhances self-esteem and creates a sense of belonging. By identifying with a specific group, members can feel part of something larger than themselves.

The division of people into in-groups and out-groups has deep evolutionary roots. Humans who banded together in groups were more likely to survive and have reproductive success. Group membership enabled more secure access to resources and safety against predators. People outside the group—out-group members—were potential threats. This dichotomy between “us” and “them” became an asset.

Favoring in-group members and suspicion of out-group members was an adaptive........

© Psychology Today