The West Bank is not approaching ignition by itself. Every “match” has a hand that strikes it—and an institution that sees the flame, possesses the power to intervene, and chooses whether to act.

Major General Avi Bluth, the IDF’s Central Command chief, reportedly warned Israel’s political leadership that one match could ignite the West Bank. That match, he said, was nationalist crime. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu then asked what plan the military had prepared for such an eruption. IDF Chief of Staff Eyal Zamir reportedly answered: “We did not come prepared to present that at this meeting.”

The exchange is extraordinary, but not because Israel’s senior officials have suddenly discovered settler violence. According to figures attributed to the security establishment, serious incidents increased by 63 percent during the first half of 2026. What is extraordinary is the language through which a process produced by identifiable people, institutions, decisions and omissions becomes a match mysteriously waiting to ignite.

A match, however, does not light itself. Someone strikes it, someone supplies the fuel, and someone removes the firebreaks. Someone watches the smoke and decides that intervention can wait. Someone receives information but declares it insufficiently specific. Someone possesses authority but declines to use it.

Metaphors become dangerous when they remove the hands from the event. “Escalation” begins to resemble weather. “Tensions” rise. “The West Bank” erupts. “Israel” responds. “The Palestinians” retaliate. Each collective noun acquires a body, intention and voice, while the actual distribution of knowledge, authority, initiative and omission disappears.

This is not merely an imprecision of journalistic language. It is one of the principal mechanisms through which responsibility becomes simultaneously universal and impossible to locate. If “Israel” is responsible, almost everyone can be accused while no particular decision point has to be identified. If........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)