From exporting spyware to surveilling activists – how democracies became the new digital authoritarians
“Digital authoritarianism” refers to governments using technology for surveillance and censorship to repress dissent.
China remains the master practitioner. There, sweeping surveillance and censorship at home is combined with cyber-espionage and disinformation, censorship and influence campaigns abroad.
But this problem is no longer confined to Moscow or Beijing. Democracies, too, are beginning to repress their citizens with the same tools, and export them abroad.
Two countries in particular – India and Israel – reveal how democracies are drifting toward the very digital authoritarianism they once opposed.
Israel: exporting spyware
Israel, a democracy, permits private firms to export spyware under a state-regulated system.
Pegasus spyware, developed by the Israeli firm NSO Group, is marketed as a tool licensed to government agencies for counterterrorism and serious crime investigations.
However, investigations have linked it to the surveillance of journalists, activists, lawyers and political opponents.
Pegasus spyware can infiltrate smartphones without the user clicking on a link. It can grant access to messages, calls, microphones and cameras.
It has been linked to the surveillance of journalists in Mexico, opposition politicians in India and civil society groups in Hungary.
Israel tightened export rules in 2021, insisting sales go only to trusted governments for legitimate purposes. Yet the problem has not........
