Though intuitively compelling, resilience and wellness programs have proven disappointing.

Poor compliance appears to be problematic.

Shifting from wellness to empowerment programs may improve compliance.

Integrating two powerful public health strategies may improve compliance and overall effectiveness.

No matter what the occupation, talent is at the center of it. Anything that threatens the well-being of the worker threatens the viability of the mission and thus the viability of the organization itself. Conversely, anything that promotes the well-being of the worker enhances the viability of the mission and thus the viability of the organization itself. Health resides at the center of personal and organizational viability; thus, the desire to promote health using workplace-based platforms should be no surprise. The workplace is where most people spend a significant proportion of their waking adult life. The implementation of resilience and wellness programs at the workplace would seem to be a compelling approach to fostering health.

Effectiveness of Resilience and Wellness Programs

Within the field of occupational health promotion, resilience programs and workplace-based wellness programs have grown meteorically in popularity within the last 15 years. That said, the overall effectiveness of resilience programs has been disappointing (Eidelson et al., 2011; Fikretoglu et al., 2019), while the effectiveness of occupational wellness programs appears to be modest at best (Virtanen et al., 2025).

While the........

© Psychology Today