In the context of the ongoing Iran war, I wonder if people have thought about the difference in intrinsic strengths between nation-States and civilisational-States. In an age where geopolitical conflicts are reduced only to metrics of military power or economic heft, conventional strategists sometimes ignore this difference.

A nation-State, in its modern conception, is a political construct. It is defined by clearly demarcated borders, a sovereign government, and a sense of shared identity that is often consciously cultivated. But most nation-States are relatively recent creations, emerging from the churn of history over the past few centuries — products of treaties, wars, colonial withdrawals, and ideological movements. In fact, before the Treaty of Westphalia in the 17th century, “nations” did not exist as political units but as cultural entities.

A civilisational-State, by contrast, is something far deeper and more enduring. It is not merely a political arrangement but a continuum of cultural, historical, and spiritual experiences accumulated over millennia. Its identity resides in a shared consciousness — an awareness of belonging to a tradition that transcends time. Language,........

© hindustantimes