9th Circuit Court Smacks Down California Law Unmasking ICE Agents For Violence-Hungry Leftists
1 Trending: Cornell’s President Understands ‘Responsibility.’ He Should Insist Jane Doe Do The Same
2 Trending: NYT Op-Ed Shows Why Voters Worried About Affordability Should Be Wary Of Democrats
3 Trending: Calls Grow For SCOTUS To Stop California’s Barfare Against John Eastman
4 Trending: By The Past Standards Of The U.S. Military, Nidal Hasan’s Scheduled Execution Is Remarkably Polite
9th Circuit Court Smacks Down California Law Unmasking ICE Agents For Violence-Hungry Leftists
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
A federal appellate court shot down a California law on Wednesday that sought to require ICE agents to show identification while conducting immigration operations in the state.
In its unanimous ruling, a three-judge panel for the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals held that Section 10 of the state’s No Vigilantes Act violates the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which specifies that federal law supersedes state law. The panel was comprised of Judge Jacqueline Nguyen, an Obama appointee, and Judges Mark Bennett and Daniel Collins, both Trump appointees.
According to The Hill, the Justice Department sued the Golden State last year after Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom signed the No Vigilantes Act, “which demands that plainclothes law enforcement officers operating in California ‘shall visibly display identification.'” In conjunction with California’s No Secret Police Act — “which banned federal law enforcement officers from wearing masks while carrying out operations in the state” — “the law took effect on Jan. 1........
