In a federal budget that sought to restore intergenerational equity, particularly through reforms to tax concessions that have long favoured Australia’s wealthiest few, the Albanese government is facing criticism for ignoring a golden opportunity to balance the scales on energy and climate.

Jim Chalmers on Tuesday night described the 2026-27 budget as “the most important and ambitious … in decades.” And while “climate” did not rate a single mention in the federal treasurer’s speech, “getting through the global oil shock and building resilience” topped his five-part economic strategy.

But Chalmers’ strategy is notably lacking in ambition on new funding for climate and renewables – and has failed to act on what is broadly considered to be the clearest political mandate, yet, to reform fossil fuel tax loopholes and subsidies.

Climate Energy Finance director Tim Buckley – while noting the $60 billion of decarbonisation and Future Made in Australia funding initiatives put in place over the last four Chalmers budgets – says this is a “glaring omission” in the context of the global fossil fuel shock and cost-of-living crisis.

“The government declined to introduce a proposed 25 per cent gas exports levy at a moment when prices are hyperinflated by Trump’s war in the Middle East, a reform which could have delivered $17 billion annually to the Budget and funded cost of living relief,” Buckley said on Wednesday.

“Instead, it buckled to appease the war-profiteering gas industry. Likewise, the failed PRRT [petroleum resource rent tax], which will deliver just $1.6 billion per annum over the next four years, was untouched.”

Also left untouched by the government was the controversial diesel Fuel Tax Credit scheme, an $11 billion a year fuel tax break that is expected to grow to $13 billion a year in 2026-27.

Iron ore billionaire........

© Pearls and Irritations