menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

How to stop judges from kidnapping when parents refuse to gender-affirm their children

3 0
yesterday

US News Metro Long Island Politics

Sports NFL MLB Olympics NBA NHL College Football College Basketball WNBA

Entertainment TV Movies Music Celebrities Awards Theater

Lifestyle Weird But True Sex & Relationships Viral Trends Human Interest Parenting Fashion & Beauty Food & Drink Travel

Health Wellness Fitness Health Care Medicine Men’s Health Women’s Health Mental Health Nutrition

Science Space Environment Wildlife Archaeology

Today’s Paper Covers Columnists Horoscopes Crosswords & Games Sports Odds Podcasts Careers

Email Newsletters Official Store Home Delivery Tips

Switch between CA and NY editions here.

How to stop judges from kidnapping when parents refuse to gender-affirm their children

See more of our coverage in your search results.

It’s been two years since Joe and Arlene Kutzko spoke to their daughter Sophie.

In 2024, the now-17-year-old was struggling with gender identity issues, which the counselor at her high school hid from her parents.

School officials encouraged her to “transition.” 

But when her Catholic parents refused to go along, the school reported them to the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families.

A judge removed Sophie from her parents and is considering DCF’s request to give her testosterone; her family has been barred from contacting her.

We ran the data on trans teen suicide panic — and found the claims are misleading

Dear Abby: My neighbor says being gay is a sin as it has posed a family conflict

Catholic parents fighting for custody of their trans teen whose school helped to transition without their knowledge: report

The Kutzkos are not alone. In Oregon, California and Colorado, child-protection agencies have removed children from their parents based solely on the parents’ refusal to “affirm” their child’s desire to transition.

But while the agencies have generally been the focus of attention in these cases, this sort of intervention — placing a child in a state’s care and ordering life-altering medical treatment — requires a judicial finding that the child is in imminent danger of harm.

Legislatures have created a high bar for meeting that standard: Negligence, parental drug abuse, homelessness and even domestic violence often do not.

So why do the Kutzkos find........

© New York Post