menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Seat Expansion or Salary Grab?

18 0
17.04.2026

In the corridors of power, the Narendra Modi government is preparing to fast ‑track a constitutional ‑cum ‑delimitation package that will increase Lok Sabha strength from the current 543–545 seats to around 815–850 and expand state assemblies by roughly 50% on a pro‑rata basis. On paper, this is framed as a decisive step toward 33% women’s reservation in Parliament and state legislatures by 2029, bypassing the earlier “first census after 2026” timeline that could have deferred it to 2034. Beneath this progressive veneer, however, lies a less‑ discussed reality: the taxpayer is being asked to permanently fund a significantly larger political class, with almost no debate on the fiscal and tax implications.

From a representational standpoint, the justification for expansion is not entirely without merit. India’s population has grown unevenly since the last major delimitation freeze after 1976. Northern states such as Uttar Pradesh and Bihar now have far more people per MP than southern states; expanding and redrawing constituencies using the 2011 Census can partially correct this imbalance. Smaller constituencies, in theory, may also make MPs and MLAs more accessible to constituents, especially in large, densely populated districts that have long been represented by a single elected member regardless of massive population growth.

The political class has also wrapped the package in the language of empowerment. By tying the seat expansion to women’s reservation, the move acquires a progressive halo that is difficult to oppose in public. The logic is clear: more seats mean more opportunities for women candidates, more visibility for marginalized voices, and a broader bench of lawmakers. Parties across the spectrum, including regional outfits, quietly welcome the prospect of more tickets, more offices, and more patronage. Expansion, therefore, arrives as a politically convenient consensus.

The Flawed Structural Architecture

Yet the design of the package raises serious structural concerns. The mere addition of seats does not guarantee higher quality legislators. Data already show that a large share of MPs face criminal cases and that the overwhelming........

© Greater Kashmir