menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

JONATHAN TURLEY: Justice Alito blazes the ethical path the Supreme Court should take

28 0
02.10.2026

Opinion

JONATHAN TURLEY: Justice Alito blazes the ethical path the Supreme Court should take

Critics called for the justice's recusal due to his financial interest in energy companies

By Jonathan Turley Fox News

Published October 2, 2026 5:00am EDT

Comments Facebook Twitter Threads Flipboard Print Email Add Fox News on Google

close

Video

Louisiana AG takes aim at 'illegal’ abortion-pill pipeline in Supreme Court lawsuit

Louisiana, Alabama and Arkansas are challenging shield laws they say block investigations into abortion-pill providers accused of sending medication across state lines.

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

On Sept. 28, Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito recused himself from one of the term's most important cases: Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County. As I have previously discussed, the case involving the liability of energy companies for nuisance actions tied to climate change could have sweeping implications for the country. Justice Alito should be commended for avoiding even the appearance of a personal interest or a conflict in the case. However, the controversy should prompt the court to explore a longstanding problem for justices holding financial interests that can conflict with their duties. The solution is simple: Justices need to use blind trusts.

Supreme Court Clerk Scott Harris released a letter revealing that Alito decided he "will not continue to participate" in Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County.

Boulder, sued energy companies under "theories of public and private nuisance, trespass, unjust enrichment, and civil conspiracy, claiming that they knowingly contributed to climate change while misleading the public about its impacts." The Colorado Supreme Court ruled for the city and the county in finding that such lawsuits are not barred by federal preemption. If such lawsuits are allowed to go forward, it would expose companies to potentially thousands of climate change lawsuits. Oral argument is set for Oct. 5.

SUPREME COURT CAN RESTORE SANITY AND STOP THE LEFT’S RADICAL CLIMATE AGENDA

The recusal is a blow for challengers who believe........

© Fox News