menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

Layoffs without recession: What AI economy is really doing to jobs

19 10
04.02.2026

The world is entering a new and unsettling phase of economic history: the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Unlike previous technological revolutions, where innovation ultimately created more jobs than it destroyed, this one challenges a foundational assumption of modern capitalism itself: that human labor remains indispensable.

Technology was once humanity’s tool to make life easier. Today, it increasingly threatens to make parts of humanity economically redundant. The uncomfortable question is no longer whether some jobs will disappear, but whether large segments of society risk becoming structurally unnecessary to the labor market. And if a person has no job, no income, and no purchasing power, what role do they play in a consumption-driven economic system?

At stake is not only employment, but the sustainability of the social contract.

A historic break in the jobs - markets relationship

For decades, a simple relationship held true in the U.S. economy: when markets rose, employment followed. When markets declined, hiring slowed. This correlation persisted through recessions, recoveries, financial crises, and booms.

Then, in late 2022, something unprecedented happened.

Financial markets surged to record highs, while job openings declined sharply. The two lines - markets and labor demand - decoupled for the first time in modern economic history.

Since the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022, the S&P 500 has climbed more than 70%, while job openings have fallen by roughly 30%. The visual contrast became known online as the “scariest chart in the world,” symbolizing a growing fear: that productivity, profits, and growth may no longer require proportional human employment.

The data itself is real. Job openings peaked at 11.5 million in March 2022, the highest level since tracking began in 2000. By August 2025, openings had fallen to about 7.18 million. Over the same period, the S&P 500 rose from roughly 3,840 to nearly 6,700.

But attributing this divergence solely to artificial intelligence would be analytically simplistic.

Monetary policy, not AI, triggered the initial decline

A closer look........

© AzerNews