We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Corbyn shows that there is more than just one type of populism

102 266 0
11.05.2017

What is the left to do, in the midst of an election campaign cast in the political mood of Brexit, narrow nationalism and a bogus-Blitz spirit? Britain’s snap election, with its looming vision of a juggernaut Tory party sucking up Ukip voters and veering ever-rightwards with regressive Little England homilies, has sent many into despair. But it’s also shaping up as the latest challenge for the populist left trying to face down a rightist surge – incarnations of which we’ve seen play out across Europe.

Populism typically gets a bad rap, as analysts either assume it is under sole ownership of the far-right, or that people-driven policies in either direction are extreme and bad. The left counters that the far-right feasts off a population feeling ignored and neglected by remote politicians, economic despair, disillusion (often cast as voter apathy) and resentment at a tiny elite that increasingly profits while the rest of us struggle.

Such sentiments can drive support in either political direction, although other factors in the mix – hostility to migrants, for example – clearly cannot. This is one way the populist left diverges from liberal centrism. Rather than seeking to accommodate a negative mood over migration (which invariably ends up confirming the far-right’s framing), left populism tries to persuade even those who disagree over “cultural issues” of a common political cause.

There’s another fundamental distinction too: the populist left in the UK, as elsewhere, casts decades of ravaging neoliberalism as the source of both economic hardship and public despair with politics; in this context, centrism’s tinkering around the edges while subscribing to the same economic playbook, isn’t going to cut it – and also perpetuates the feeling often heard on doorsteps that, whoever you vote for, nothing changes.

This may explain much of what the Labour party’s election campaign under Jeremy Corbyn is setting out, both in tone and content. The repeated insistence that the party won’t “play by the rules” signals a break with the consensus politics that has alienated so many. The shared political cause appears in an identification of common enemies that have benefited from a “rigged system”: exploitative wealth extractors, tax-avoiders, Rich List Tory Funders. Meanwhile, referring in a single sentence to different groups of people, such as nurses, carers, soldiers, the disabled, young people and the elderly, signposts that these are not atomised, disparate and competing interests but rather a struggling, underfunded collective, a population currently going backwards in the same boat.

It’s in the policy proposals, too. Take Labour’s pledge to raise tax only for those earning above £80,000.........

© Independent