Vaughn Palmer: 'It's not a slush fund,' says B.C. NDP
Share this Story : Vancouver Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Vaughn Palmer: 'It's not a slush fund,' says B.C. NDP
Opinion: The New Democrats last week passed legislation to give the cabinet open-ended authority to support favoured businesses with loans and grants from a $400 million strategic investment fund
You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.
VICTORIA — The B.C. New Democrats last week passed legislation to give cabinet open-ended authority to support favoured businesses with loans and grants from a $400 million strategic investment fund.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada.
Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account.
Get exclusive access to the Vancouver Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on.
Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists.
Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.
Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.
Access articles from across Canada with one account
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
Enjoy additional articles per month
Get email updates from your favourite authors
Sign In or Create an Account
The B.C. Conservatives branded it a “slush fund,” drawing protests from the government side.
“A slush fund doesn’t come with public reporting requirements, independent oversight, measurable performance targets,” huffed NDP back-bencher Darlene Rotchford. “This fund does.”
None of those details are spelled out in Bill 3, the enabling legislation for the fund.
There was an error, please provide a valid email address.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.
Even such concepts as “strategic investment” and “eligible recipient” are left to be defined at a later date by treasury board, the Cabinet committee that oversees withdrawals from the fund.
The Opposition spent much of the debate on Bill 3 trying to determine what restrictions, if any, would apply to funding decisions.
Jobs Minister Ravi Kahlon insisted the screening process would be rigorous when the regulations are drafted and released later this year.
“Proponents should expect the fundamentals of their projects to be scrutinized and tested, to be the subject of detailed financial and business case analysis and stress testing,” said Kahlon. “In short, proponents should expect us to look closely under the hood.”
But when Conservative and Green MLAs tried to look under the hood of Bill 3, they were met again and again by Kahlon saying they should wait for the regulations.
“The minister said that, of course, we’ll have the ability to ask all the questions we like under this new fund,” said B.C. Conservative MLA Peter Milobar. “Questions are the easy part. It’s the answering part that the government has problems with.”
Vaughn Palmer: David Eby, not B.C. Conservatives, proving the biggest threat to Indigenous reconciliation
Vaughn Palmer: Lawyer's opinion may not sway Aboriginal title case, but it hurts B.C. landowners
Advertisement 1Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});
Few institutions in government are less responsive to questions than treasury board, said Milobar, who summarized a typical exchange with the secretive Cabinet committee:
Q: Well, what was on the agenda? A: We can’t talk about the treasury board agenda.
Q: Well, what was the vote? A: We can’t talk about treasury board votes.
Q: Can we see the minutes of the decision? A: We can’t talk about what happens at treasury board.
Besides, as Milobar also noted, the real decisions are made in the premier’s office.
“Let’s just admit how the real world works in this building,” said Milobar, who is also a candidate for the leadership of his party. “Treasury board will do exactly as the premier’s office advises with this $400 million, or you will not be on treasury board any longer.”
RCMP with guns drawn enter Burnaby North high school but threat was false News
RCMP with guns drawn enter Burnaby North high school but threat was false
Vaughn Palmer: 'It's not a slush fund,' says B.C. NDP Columnists
Vaughn Palmer: 'It's not a slush fund,' says B.C. NDP
Advertisement 2Story continues belowThis advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.document.addEventListener(`DOMContentLoaded`,function(){let template=document.getElementById(`oop-ad-template`);if(template&&!template.dataset.adInjected){let clone=template.content.cloneNode(!0);template.replaceWith(clone),template.parentElement&&(template.parentElement.dataset.adInjected=`true`)}});
'Robbery gone wrong'. Defence begins arguments for trio accused of murdering Abbotsford couple News
'Robbery gone wrong'. Defence begins arguments for trio accused of murdering Abbotsford couple
B.C. gas prices soar as war in Iran hits worldwide oil supply News
B.C. gas prices soar as war in Iran hits worldwide oil supply
Expanded Trans Mountain pipeline almost doubles oil exports from Port of Vancouver Business
Expanded Trans Mountain pipeline almost doubles oil exports from Port of Vancouver
The Opposition asked about a retroactivity provision that would allow treasury board to go back as far as eight years in redefining previous NDP government deals as strategic investments.
“Why would expenditures from 2018 until now suddenly be eligible under Bill 3?” asked Milobar. “What grants have been given out that shouldn’t have? What paperwork is being caught up right now that the government said: ‘Oopsie, I guess we better cover it?’”
Kahlon replied, in effect, “trust us.”
Overall, the legislation would allow B.C. to partner up quickly with federal government investments in strategic industries, the New Democrats argued.
Other provinces were doing that and B.C. needed to do the same.
“Do you know Ontario has this?” one of the New Democrats challenged the Opposition at one point.
“Did you know Alberta doesn’t have any provincial sales tax?” Milobar fired back.
As the debate continued, Kahlon showed signs of impatience, at one point suggesting Milobar should pose his questions directly to the minister of finance.
The bill in question was introduced by Finance Minister Brenda Bailey, Milobar conceded. But it was the New Democrats who decided that Kahlon would steer it through the house, with Bailey’s staff backing him up in answering questions.
But if Kahlon didn’t feel up to the challenge, Milobar offered to pause the debate until a more knowledgeable minister was available.
His bluff called, Kahlon backed off and went back to giving answers, as vague as they were.
One of the NDP’s big selling points on the legislation was that it gives the government a piece of the action on strategic investments.
“We can now make direct equity investments. We can take ownership stakes,” as cabinet minister Rick Glumac put it. “We become a financial partner. If a company succeeds, B.C. shares in that success.”
And if the company fails, won’t British Columbians be on the hook for treasury board having bet on a losing horse with public money?
The possibility never seems to have occurred to the NDP cabinet and caucus.
“Apparently, the government is going to be the only angel investor out there that always gets a return on their investment and never sees their fund diminish,” said Milobar. “But that’s not the real world, if you’re talking about high-risk venture capital schemes that the government is talking about.”
The Greens initially supported the bill but voted against on third reading after hearing the inadequate answers from the government.
Still, the NDP majority was enough to carry the day. The bill passed, clearing the way for the most secretive committee in government to write blank cheques for preferred industries on terms to be defined later — if at all.
vpalmer@postmedia.com
Share this Story : Vancouver Sun Copy Link Email X Reddit Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr
Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.
