We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close
Aa Aa Aa
- A +

Why universities should defend, not censor, offensive speech

1 7 0

Every right I have today results from movements once deemed “offensive.”

The idea that I, a 21-year-old woman, am not solely dedicated to housework would astonish the founders of Princeton University, where I am a student. It was less than 60 years ago that Princeton began admitting female students, but now women compose 50% of its undergraduate population.

Women were largely excluded from American politics until only a century ago, but today I am a student in the Department of Politics.

American society has progressed so greatly since its founding that now I can marry another woman, or a woman who has undergone gender reassignment surgeries.

The gauge of “offensive” evolves so drastically and rapidly that we cannot employ it as a reliable measure for appropriate conduct. We exercise many rights today – including the right to free expression – because unorthodox ideas were eventually recognized by society as acceptable.

This does not immediately warrant all offensive propositions as valid, but proves it is prudent to consider such ideas.

Let them speak: Intellectual diversity means don't cut off the mic, even if you disagree.

Yet, many of my peers – and some of my professors – desire to restrict free speech. In the spirit of considering controversial opinions, I will afford them the courtesy of entertaining their proposition, although they rarely extend such grace to conservative perspectives.

The hypothetical imposition of speech supervision prompts important questions: Who........


Get it on Google Play