Fact-based journalism that sparks the Canadian conversation

Articles Business Environment Health Politics Arts & Culture Society

Special Series Hope You’re Well For the Love of the Game Living Rooms In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration Terra Cognita More special series >

For the Love of the Game

In Other Worlds: A Space Exploration

More special series >

Events The Walrus Talks The Walrus Video Room The Walrus Leadership Roundtables The Walrus Leadership Forums Article Club

The Walrus Video Room

The Walrus Leadership Roundtables

The Walrus Leadership Forums

Subscribe Renew your subscription Change your address Magazine Issues Newsletters Podcasts

Renew your subscription

The Walrus Lab Hire The Walrus Lab Amazon First Novel Award

Amazon First Novel Award

Your Smart Home Has Been Spying on You This Whole Time

Millions use connected devices. Most have no idea how much data those tools collect

There was a time when the walls around you were mute, passive, indifferent to your presence. The door stayed closed unless you opened it, the lights remained off unless you flipped the switch, the air remained heavy unless you adjusted it yourself. The home was a shelter, a place where action was visible and cause was tangible, where comfort depended on conscious effort, and the environment responded only to direct, physical commands.

Then, almost without ceremony, the house began to wake up. It started with small conveniences: a thermostat you could adjust from your phone, a set of lights that obeyed a remote click instead of a wall-mounted switch, a speaker that responded to your voice with weather reports or trivia questions. These early steps felt like miracles of frictionless living, tiny victories over the minor annoyances of daily maintenance. What harm could there be in a house that helped you with reminders, adjusted to your preferences, tuned itself to your rhythms?

At first, the sensation was one of empowerment. Your home seemed to rise into consciousness, an extension of your intent, your desire, your immediate needs. It learned not just to obey, but to anticipate. But in surrendering these small frictions, you also surrendered something less visible: the finality of action, the privacy of space, the solitude of thought that once came naturally when the walls were deaf and the appliances were dumb.

The first time you asked a digital assistant to dim the lights, order paper towels, or play a favourite song, it felt indulgent, futuristic, almost magical. You spoke, and the world obeyed. Tasks that once required movement, planning, and minor effort now unfolded at the speed of voice. It was thrilling, in the way a magic trick is thrilling the first time it is revealed: astonishing not just because it happened but because it violated your expectations of what should be possible.

But convenience, once tasted, rarely remains a luxury. It becomes expectation, and soon, you no longer marvelled at the lights that dimmed on command. You grew impatient when they did not. You no longer admired the thermostat that adjusted itself as you arrived home; you became irritated when it failed to anticipate a change in the weather. Convenience, once a gift, hardened into entitlement.

The smart home shifted the baseline of comfort, not by dramatically transforming the nature of life but by eroding your tolerance for any friction at all. You learned, slowly and without intent to regard effort as failure, delay as inconvenience, manual action as an insult to your lifestyle.

And because these technologies were embedded invisibly into your daily rituals, you forgot how recent these expectations of technology were. You forgot that, not long ago, it was normal to return to a cold house, to fumble for a light switch in the dark, to make lists by hand and shop without digital assistants buffering your forgetfulness. You did not notice how quickly you adjusted to a home that served you, and how quickly you lost the resilience that came from serving yourself.

I tried to join the smart home movement early, perhaps too early. The moment the Nest thermostat was announced, I bought one. The promise of intelligent climate control was irresistible. But upon installation, I was promptly told that it wasn’t compatible with older buildings like my condo. It was like........

© The Walrus