UNRWA vs UNHCR: Two Systems, Two Standards
UNRWA vs UNHCR: Two Systems, Two Standards
For more than seven decades, the world has operated two entirely different refugee systems under the United Nations. One is designed to resolve refugee crises. The other has institutionalized one. The contrast between UNHCR and UNRWA is not merely bureaucratic, it is moral, political, and deeply consequential. Nowhere did this failure become more visible than on October 7.
UNHCR, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, was created to solve refugee problems. UNRWA, the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees, has done the opposite: it has preserved, expanded, and politicized refugee status across generations. The result is a system that perpetuates conflict instead of alleviating human suffering.
This is not rhetoric. It is structural fact.
UNHCR operates worldwide. Its mandate is clear:
Since 1950, UNHCR has helped resettle or integrate tens of millions of refugees:
Their children do not inherit refugee status automatically. Refugeehood is not a bloodline.
UNRWA operates differently:
In 1949, around 700,000 Arab refugees existed after Israel’s War of Independence, a war initiated by surrounding Arab states. Today, UNRWA claims........





















Toi Staff
Sabine Sterk
Gideon Levy
Penny S. Tee
Mark Travers Ph.d
John Nosta
Daniel Orenstein
Rachel Marsden