There is a certain kind of argument that appears in every generation: the claim that, with the right tools and the right design, we can finally take control of our collective destiny. Today, that argument often arrives dressed in the language of strategy, capital, and systems. It points to new capabilities—artificial intelligence, global finance, coordinated investment—and suggests that what was once impossible is now within reach. If only we organize correctly, we can secure ourselves against uncertainty, vulnerability, and dependence.

I recently encountered a version of this argument in a proposal for a Jewish sovereign wealth fund. The premise is straightforward: Jewish life, particularly in the diaspora, has relied too heavily on indirect influence and diffuse institutions. In a world of declining trust and rising volatility, this model is said to be insufficient. What is needed instead is a more legible, centralized, and strategic deployment of power—something closer to sovereignty, even without a state.

There is a real concern here. The instability of institutions and the long-term risks facing Jewish communities are not imaginary. But the proposed solution reveals a deeper assumption: that greater control, if properly structured, can meaningfully reduce vulnerability. It assumes that power, once concentrated, can remain aligned with its intended purpose. It assumes, in short, that this time we can build a system that will not outgrow the moral and relational constraints that shape........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)