With the hostage issue in Gaza approaching a critical juncture and the Trump administration signaling a transition to Phase Two of its 20-point peace plan, a serious discussion is needed about who will replace Hamas — and under what conditions — in order to establish long-term peace and security in the region.

Any alternative governing authority capable of stabilizing the Gaza Strip must be able to unify Palestinians, maintain internal order, and possess the institutional capacity to govern and provide basic services. Despite its serious flaws — and notwithstanding the current Israeli government’s opposition — the Palestinian Authority (PA) remains the only existing Palestinian body that could plausibly meet these criteria.

That reality, however, does not mean the PA is ready to rule Gaza in its current form. Meaningful reforms will be required before it can ensure both Palestinian welfare and Israeli security. Much of the public discussion around PA reform has focused on two well-documented problems: incitement in educational materials and the so-called “pay-for-slay” policy, which has tied financial benefits to attacks against Israelis.

While these issues are serious and must be addressed, they are insufficient on their own. Even as the PA has partially shifted toward a welfare system based on socioeconomic need rather than rewards for violence, such changes remain incomplete if they are not accompanied by broader........

© The Times of Israel (Blogs)