Featured Post |
The Department of Justice filed suit against Harvard University Friday morning, and by the afternoon, the media-academic complex was already vociferously outraged: this is retaliation, said Harvard; this is a smokescreen, echoed the press corps, borrowing Judge Allison Burroughs’ September ruling. Within hours, the story had been compressed into the familiar frame: Trump targets Harvard again, round three, nothing to see here.
That framing is wrong. Not entirely wrong – the political context around this administration’s Harvard campaign is legitimately complicated, and I’ll get to that. But the lazy collapse of a serious civil rights complaint into a pure political grievance does exactly what Harvard wants: it lets the institution escape accountability for years of documented, self-admitted institutional failure by hiding behind a president its critics already despise.
The complaint is serious and damning.
What the complaint actually says
The government’s theory has two distinct prongs, and both are well-constructed.
The first is deliberate indifference. Under Davis v. Monroe County, a federally funded institution violates Title VI when it has actual knowledge of severe, pervasive, and objectively offensive harassment and responds with deliberate indifference. Harvard’s own Presidential Task Force – commissioned by Harvard, staffed by Harvard, published by Harvard – concluded that Jewish and Israeli students faced “dire” conditions, were subjected to “social exclusion,” experienced “widespread” discrimination by peers and professors alike, and that Harvard’s complaint mechanisms lacked even “foundational awareness” of how to handle antisemitism reports. Harvard’s own task force said that. The government didn’t manufacture that record. Harvard produced it.
The second prong is more interesting and, in some ways, stronger: intentional selective enforcement. The complaint documents a pattern of Harvard enforcing its rules vigorously against everyone except those targeting Jews. In 2017, Harvard rescinded ten admissions offers over offensive private Facebook messages. In 2022, it canceled a lecture by a feminist philosopher over her views on transgender identity. When a gay law student was assaulted, Harvard sent a campus-wide email condemning the attack........