International politics is often characterized by nations placing their self-interest above moral principles. While diplomatic discourse may frequently emphasize ideals such as justice, human rights, and ethical governance, state actions often diverge from these values, prioritizing power, security, and strategic objectives. This article will argue that morality seldom guides international politics, illustrated through Pakistan’s silence on the Uyghur crisis, the global response to the Palestine-Israel conflict, and Iran’s support for India over Pakistan on the Kashmir issue.
Power Over Morality
The realist school of thought in international relations argues that states primarily act out of self-interest, focusing on their power and survival. Realists contend that morality plays a minimal role in the decision-making of nations, with the international system being anarchic, meaning there is no higher authority to enforce ethical behavior. States, therefore, seek to maximize their security and interests, often at the expense of moral principles. Historical examples, such as the Cold War and colonialism, illustrate how states have consistently prioritized their own needs over ethical considerations.
Politics without Ethics is a DisasterThe Global Response to the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Another glaring example of morality taking a back seat in international politics is the global response to the Palestine-Israel conflict. For decades, Palestinians have endured occupation, displacement, and systematic human rights violations. However, the international community’s response to this ongoing crisis has been largely tepid and uninvolved. A key factor in this is the role of the United States, which continues to provide unwavering military, economic, and diplomatic support to Israel, driven primarily by strategic interests rather than moral........