Water should not become a weapon in South Asia
Water has long been described as the lifeblood of civilization. In South Asia, where hundreds of millions depend on the Indus river system for food security, livelihoods and economic stability, it is also an indispensable strategic resource. When water becomes an instrument of political coercion rather than regional cooperation, it threatens not only bilateral relations but also the stability of an already fragile region. For more than six decades, the Indus Waters Treaty has stood as one of the world’s most resilient water-sharing agreements. The treaty’s endurance reflected a recognition that water should remain insulated from political disputes. Following periods of heightened tensions, New Delhi has also signaled its intention to reassess aspects of the treaty and accelerate hydropower and water storage projects on the western rivers. While India maintains that these initiatives remain within its treaty rights, Pakistan has repeatedly expressed concern that cumulative infrastructure development could reduce transparency, complicate water management and create opportunities for political leverage. The issue extends beyond legal interpretation. It concerns the emerging perception that water is gradually becoming part of the broader arsenal of statecraft. Even if no treaty obligations are formally violated, repeated political messaging linking water management to unrelated security disputes risks transforming a shared natural resource into a coercive diplomatic instrument. Pakistan’s agriculture remains heavily dependent on the Indus basin. Seasonal uncertainty, glacier retreat, erratic monsoon patterns and climate change have already placed enormous stress on water availability. Any perception that upstream flows may become subject to political calculations inevitably heightens insecurity among downstream communities and policymakers alike. International law has consistently emphasized that Transboundary Rivers require cooperation rather than confrontation. Principles of equitable and reasonable utilization, prior notification of major projects and the obligation to avoid significant downstream harm have become central pillars of global water governance. These norms recognize a simple reality: rivers ignore political borders. History offers........
