One of the stranger ideas being repeated consistently in music circles in Pakistan over the past decade is that audiences no longer care about musicianship. They care about the narrative. Technique, it is asserted, belongs to an older world of gatekeepers and specialists. What matters now is honesty, authenticity and the ability to communicate a personal truth. The argument has become increasingly influential, particularly within elite urban creative circles that view older standards of musical authority with suspicion. I contend that this argument rests upon a false binary. It assumes that musicianship can be reduced to displays of virtuosity and that emotional communication exists independently of craft. Both assumptions collapse under scrutiny. A singer's ability to shape a phrase, control rhythmic placement, manipulate tension and release, or inhabit the emotional architecture of a composition is no less a form of communication than the autobiographical content of a lyric. To contrast narrative with technique is therefore to mistake one narrow manifestation of skill for the totality of musicianship itself. More significantly, it risks reducing music to a form of testimony in which the artist's personal story matters more than the artistic means through which that story is communicated. Asad Ali Murtaza, a keys and harmonium player who has performed in Coke Studio and Nescafe Basement, and a dear friend of mine, strongly objected to the suggestion that honesty somehow exempts one from learning the craft in a recent discussion while working on an arrangement project with me.

The reduction of musicianship to spectacle has had significant consequences for how musical value is discussed. Somewhere along the way, musicianship became confused with flamboyant showboating. The fast taan, the mordent, and the shredded instrumental phrase became shorthand for everything supposedly wrong with traditional ideas of musical........

© The Nation