Memphis proves enforcement data clarifies the rule of law debate |
Memphis proves enforcement data clarifies the rule of law debate
The immigration enforcement debate generates far more heat than light. What it rarely generates is data. The Memphis Safe Task Force changed that.
Seven weeks of collaborative enforcement combining Tennessee Highway Patrol, Memphis Police and Immigration and Customs Enforcement resulted in over 4,000 arrests and more than 629 firearms seized. Part I crimes are down 27 percent, violent crime are down 30 percent, carjackings are down 48 percent and murders at their lowest level since 2019.
Those numbers are real, and they deserve serious engagement. They also create a more complicated constitutional picture than either side of the immigration debate typically acknowledges.
The legal framework is straightforward. In 2012, Arizona v. United States confirmed that immigration enforcement is exclusively federal. Sanctuary policies may limit local participation but cannot obstruct federal operations. The Constitution’s Take Care Clause requires the president to “faithfully execute” the laws. On these questions, the federal government’s legal authority is not genuinely in dispute.
Where constitutional tension begins is in enforcement scope. Department of Homeland Security data shows approximately 70 percent of ICE arrests nationally involved individuals with prior convictions. In Tennessee, nearly 60 percent had no prior convictions — many arrested in traffic stops. The administration describes its targets as the “worst of the worst.” The Tennessee data does not match that description. That gap matters because the Supreme Court has held, in both Wayte v. United States (1985) and Heckler v. Chaney (1985), that enforcement discretion has constitutional limits where it becomes arbitrary or is based on impermissible factors.
This is not an argument against enforcement. It is an argument for targeted enforcement — which is precisely what produced the Memphis results. Officials credit intelligence-driven operations and multi-agency coordination for outcomes that did not materialize before the task force’s formation.
The second challenge to the rule of law in this debate is rhetorical. Characterizing enforcement opponents as a funded socialist conspiracy, framing elections as existential battles for civilization, describing legal institutions as obstacles to necessary action — this rhetoric corrodes the civic norms that give law its legitimacy. The First Amendment protects organized opposition across the ideological spectrum. Congressional scrutiny of funding networks is legitimate. But declaring all opposition manufactured delegitimizes the rule of law more effectively than any court ruling.
As Justice Davis wrote in Ex parte Milligan in 1866: “The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and in peace.” The Memphis experiment demonstrates what principled, targeted, data-driven enforcement can achieve.
The constitutional framework requires that the discipline extend to enforcement scope and political rhetoric as well as operational execution. Both matter. Both are achievable. Memphis proved it.
Jay Rogers is an investment professional, expert witness and graduate of Northeastern University College of Criminal Justice.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
More Opinions - Criminal Justice News
Thune: Republicans will use SAVE Act in midterms if Democrats don’t get ‘on ...
Trump’s takeover of DC landmarks reaches legal apex
Rand Paul confronts Markwayne Mullin over ‘snake’ remark; says he has ...
US military drops 5,000-pound deep-penetrator bombs near Strait of Hormuz
Judge skeptical over Trump ballroom project amid new bid to halt it
GOP tempers flare over how to pass SAVE America Act
Watch live: Mullin faces questioning from Senate on DHS nomination
Republicans collide with Trump over no-excuse absentee voting, SAVE Act
Judge permanently blocks Ten Commandments displays at several Arkansas school ...
Live updates: Mullin, Paul tussle at start of DHS questioning; Kent resignation ...
Peters presses Mullin to explain past comments: ‘Where did you smell war?’
Senate votes to begin marathon debate on SAVE America Act
Former Trump appointee: MAGA movement is ‘dead’
Democrats are being total hypocrites over the SAVE America Act
Johnson says Democrats’ pitch to fund DHS without ICE, CBP would ‘defund ...
Sununu on TSA workers, DHS shutdown: ‘I don’t think there’s ...
Army general left classified maps on train, concussed after ...
Watch live: Gabbard testifies before Senate after staffer resigns over Iran war
The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report