Trump’s immigration enforcement tactics are backfiring on Republicans |
Sign Up Account Profile Log Out
Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement
Technology Newsletter
News Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News
Policy Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability
Business Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying
Opinion Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content
All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House
Opinions – Civil Rights
Opinions – Criminal Justice
Opinions – Cybersecurity
Opinions – Energy and Environment
Opinions – Healthcare
Opinions – Immigration
Opinions – International
Opinions – National Security
Opinions – Technology
Opinions – White House
Submit Opinion Content
Events Upcoming Events About
Sign Up Account Profile Log Out
Live updates: DHS funding
Content from Google Cloud
Iran fired live exercises ahead of second round of US nuclear talks International | 8 minutes ago
Supreme Court unveils tool to help justices identify conflicts of interest Court Battles | 10 minutes ago
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin exiting Trump administration Administration | 18 minutes ago
Trump presses DC-area officials on Potomac spill: ‘I am awaiting your call’ Energy & Environment | 19 minutes ago
Political world mourns Jesse Jackson In The Know | 24 minutes ago
US military blows up 3 alleged drug boats, killing 11 individuals Defense | 31 minutes ago
Opinion Trump’s immigration enforcement tactics are backfiring on Republicans Opinions - Immigration | 31 minutes ago
Jill Biden’s ex-husband pleads not guilty in wife’s death Court Battles | 32 minutes ago
Trump’s immigration enforcement tactics are backfiring on Republicans
The dam of Republican acquiescence to the Trump administration’s over-the-top immigrant deportation policy has begun to break.
The deaths of two Minneapolis protesters have galvanized lawmakers and broken their trance of fear of the president. Criticism of Immigration and Customs Enforcement tactics has extended beyond long-time Trump skeptic Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and lame-duck Sen. Thomas Tillis (R-N.C.) to include other moderates such as Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) and deeply conservative Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). That Lawler is facing re-election this fall is no coincidence.
But a real break from Trump’s border control and deportation policies will only come with serious consideration and endorsement of proposals for policy change that deal with the estimated 13 million undocumented immigrants already in the U.S.
A key test will be whether legislation dubbed the Dignity Act gains traction in Congress. It’s both a creative and constructive proposal with one disappointing flaw — its disdain for a “path to citizenship” even for those who jump through a difficult series of hoops to gain legal status.
Drafted by Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R-Fla.), it overlaps in some familiar ways with Trump’s policies, backing a built-out border wall and an increase in the number of Border Patrol agents. But it also proposes technological enforcement innovations such as the use of “biometric samples” to check on individual criminal histories, and an Immigration Infrastructure Fund that would provide assistance for border communities.
Furthermore, the act breaks ranks with the hardline anti-immigrant views of domestic policy adviser Stephen Miller by mapping routes for legal status for illegal immigrants and their children currently in the U.S. The Dignity Act’s core idea is that the prospect of permanent legal status for the undocumented should be possible, if they complete a series of steps over a seven-year period and can demonstrate they’ve already been in the country at least five years.
Although a lengthy process, it nonetheless represents compromise on how to deal with undocumented immigrants, by offering more than just border control and deportation. In other words, it’s the sort of compromise the issue demands — and as such, it has attracted Democratic co-sponsors Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas) and Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D-Pa.).
Requirements range from “restitution” to ongoing employment. Individuals seeking such status would have to pay $5,000 over a seven-year period and report regularly to the Department of Homeland Security. They’d have to pay taxes and pay for their own health coverage, not be supported by any government “benefits or entitlement programs,” and “remain in good public standing.” Required, as well, is learning “English and US civics” and to “contribute to their community, including through volunteer work.”
There was a time when we were unabashed about calling this assimilation or Americanization — the Dignity Act dares to rediscover this.
The bill breaks from Trump policies in another key way: by putting part of the onus on those hiring illegal immigrants. The proposal would require employers to use the so-called E-Verify system, a national database of those legally authorized to work in the country. It has been historically criticized by civil libertarians who have complained about potential inaccuracies since it began as a voluntary program as part of the Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996. But technology has improved since then, to put it mildly.
The constructive common sense of most of the Dignity Act makes it hard to understand, then, why the bill and its supporters fail to include a path to citizenship. It’s hard to view as desirable the prospect of millions of legal, permanent residents not having the chance to become citizens.
Currently, they would, per the Constitution, continue to be counted in the Census for purposes of determining population and the number of each state’s congressional seats. But those with permanent legal residency cannot vote — meaning their members of Congress could safely ignore their concerns.
Why would we want a permanent class of residents in a sort of limbo status as to whether they are Americans, or have the chance to be recognized as such? Notably, the same requirements found in the Dignity Act — to learn English and civics — are the requirements for passing the citizenship test.
To say that passing legislation of this kind would be a heavy lift is an understatement, of course. A not dissimilar (though more complex) “comprehensive” immigration reform bill sponsored by both Chuck Schumer and Marco Rubio passed the Senate in 2013 before failing in the House. Neither the Obama nor Biden administrations — nor, of course, the first Trump term — revived it. But the combination of dimming midterm prospects and Minneapolis blowback could plausibly lead to a Nixon-goes-to-China immigration moment for Trump. That can only come if more members of Congress continue to speak out for constructive change.
Howard Husock is a Senior Fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He served as an adviser for the Brookings Institution report “Breaking the Immigration Stalemate.”
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
More Opinions - Immigration News
DHS spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin exiting Trump administration
DHS shutdown has no clear off-ramp: 5 takeaways
Senate Democrats send counteroffer to White House amid DHS shutdown
Colbert rips CBS, saying lawyers barred interview with lawmaker
What to know about the disastrous Potomac sewage spill
Ocasio-Cortez’s Munich appearance draws mixed response from Democrats
More and more ham sandwiches aren’t getting indicted nowadays
Republicans worry party won’t do enough to address costs before midterms
Noem dismisses criticism of ‘right people’ voting for ‘right ...
Why violent crime is dropping in US cities
Pentagon reviewing Anthropic partnership over terms of use dispute
Hillary Clinton gets in testy exchange with European leader over Trump
Live updates: Democrats make new offer in DHS fight; US takes part in talks ...
Donald Trump and the disgrace of Presidents Day
Hillary Clinton: Trump administration perpetuating Epstein files ‘cover-up’
Trump’s immigration enforcement tactics are backfiring on Republicans
Trump slams Newsom over ‘inappropriate’ California-UK energy agreement
China’s mystery seeds are an ongoing attack on America’s food supply
The Hill Podcasts – Morning Report
2024 Election Results
2024 Election Forecast
Regulation - Administration
Energy & Environment Video Clips
Health Care Video Clips
Technology Video Clips
Transportation Video Clips
International Video Clips
Cybersecurity Video Clips
National Security Video Clips
Contributors to The Hill
Submit Opinion Content
PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025
Advertise with Nexstar
Journalistic Integrity
THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002
© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.
By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.
By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.
The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.
Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.
The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Check your email inbox
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Thanks for registering!
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Are you sure you want to log out?