Consolidate US counterintelligence into two powerhouse agencies |
Sign Up Account Profile Log Out
Newsletters Morning Report 12:30 Report Evening Report Business Defense Health Care Technology Newsletter Energy & Environment Whole Hog Politics The Gavel The Movement
Technology Newsletter
NEWS Senate House Administration Courts Future America Media Campaign News Education In The Know Latino LGBTQ DC News Race & Politics State Watch Print Edition People in the News
POLICY Defense Health Care Energy & Environment Technology Transportation International Cybersecurity National Security Space Sustainability
BUSINESS Budget Taxes Personal Finance Lobbying
OPINION Columnists Congress Blog All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House Submit Opinion Content
All Contributors Opinions – Campaign Opinions – Civil Rights Opinions – Criminal Justice Opinions – Cybersecurity Opinions – Education Opinions – Energy and Environment Opinions – Finance Opinions – Healthcare Opinions – Immigration Opinions – International Opinions – Judiciary Opinions – National Security Opinions – Technology Opinions – White House
Opinions – Civil Rights
Opinions – Criminal Justice
Opinions – Cybersecurity
Opinions – Energy and Environment
Opinions – Healthcare
Opinions – Immigration
Opinions – International
Opinions – National Security
Opinions – Technology
Opinions – White House
Submit Opinion Content
EVENTS Upcoming Events About
Sign Up Account Profile Log Out
Live updates: State of the Union
Trump approval rating
Content from Google Cloud
2,000+ flights cancelled as storm disruption lingers Transportation | 1 minute ago
Opinion Pam Bondi thought grand jurors were stupid. They showed her a thing or two. Opinions - Criminal Justice | 2 minutes ago
Opinion Consolidate US counterintelligence into two powerhouse agencies Opinions - National Security | 2 minutes ago
Trump’s tricky balance for State of the Union 12:30 Report | 24 minutes ago
Opinion All eyes on Iran: How far is Trump willing to go? Opinions - National Security | 32 minutes ago
Senate Democrats press CFTC chair on prediction markets Senate | 35 minutes ago
New British ambassador dishes on Trump’s ‘genius,’ post-Mandelson vetting and Chagos tensions Administration | 42 minutes ago
Federal Reserve governor warns AI could lead to rise in unemployment rate Technology | 47 minutes ago
Consolidate US counterintelligence into two powerhouse agencies
For decades, American counterintelligence has failed due to an organizational structure that encourages parochialism and risk-aversion rather than collaboration and bold action. In 2012, National Security Agency and U.S. Cyber Command leader Gen. Keith Alexander said that Chinese cyber espionage was facilitating “the greatest transfer of wealth in history.”
In the years since, America’s response has failed to deter China’s pillaging of U.S. intellectual property and secrets.
Chinese espionage has acquired trillions of dollars worth of American intellectual property. This theft frees money that would otherwise be spent on military research and development. It subsidizes Chinese living standards and invests in diplomatic initiatives that increase China’s influence around the world.
If these advantages are too abstract to motivate an American response, the danger faced by our military service members should focus our attention. China’s J-20 and J-35 fighters are fifth-generation aircraft that were rapidly developed, in part, because of Chinese espionage. In the event of conflict, these fighters pose real risks to American military personnel. Many may die because American counterintelligence couldn’t stop the Chinese from acquiring our sensitive information.
The House and Senate Intelligence Committees both realize the catastrophic nature of the situation. Competing proposals championed by Rep. Rick Crawford (R-Ark.) and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) would make significant changes to counterintelligence management. Neither get the issue exactly right.
Concentrating additional counterintelligence responsibilities inside the FBI, a key part of the Senate proposal, should be a non-starter, given the organization’s failure to stem the tide of Chinese espionage. Periodic high-profile arrests don’t negate the shortcomings. Beyond counterintelligence, the FBI is the nation’s lead criminal investigative agency, and their attention is divided among various responsibilities.
The House proposal creates a national director of counterintelligence but doesn’t fundamentally alter how agencies are organized. This is a mistake.
For decades, the U.S. has treated counterintelligence as a law enforcement function and housed it within federal police agencies. The staggering setbacks we’ve suffered illustrate the folly of that decision.
It’s time to consolidate America’s counterintelligence organizations into two agencies, one focused on the requirements of the U.S. military and the other assuming counterintelligence responsibilities from the FBI. The new organization would take its place alongside Britain’s MI5, Australia’s Security Intelligence Organization and other agencies maintained by America’s allies.
A narrowly focused agency isn’t without precedent: The Drug Enforcement Administration is one example. The DEA exists because protecting Americans from illegal drugs is crucial. Halting the loss of sensitive information, ensuring our military can prevail in a conflict, confusing our adversaries and shaping their perceptions is more than crucial. It’s essential for our standing as the world’s dominant power and for the safety and prosperity of the American people.
The unique requirements of the Armed Forces justify the existence of a dedicated organization exclusively focused on their needs. Under the current structure, the Army, Navy and Air Force all maintain their own counterintelligence organizations, and, except for the Army, these are part of multi-purpose law enforcement agencies along the lines of the FBI. Even the Army, which has a dedicated counterintelligence organization, is focused on counterespionage investigations instead of operations and runs the risk of recreating the law enforcement culture that saps operational creativity.
Combining Army, Navy and Air Force counterintelligence into a single agency would facilitate a more effective allocation of limited resources such as surveillance and cyber, which are now mostly controlled by the individual counterintelligence agencies. When the Army, Navy or Air Force dedicate assets to their individual priorities, they aren’t necessarily leveraging them against the counterintelligence activities that matter most to the nation. A combined agency would also allow for broad campaigns that are difficult to coordinate across disparate agencies
Creating two counterintelligence agencies — one focused on the military and one that assumes the FBI’s mission — ensures policymakers aren’t forced to make decisions based on a single agency’s conclusions. The U.S. already uses this model for intelligence analysis. The Central Intelligence Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency often produce independent analysis from the same set of facts.
America’s counterintelligence failure has cost the nation jobs, put the lives of service members at risk, eroded our strategic advantage and emboldened our adversaries. The losses are staggering, but because they occur quietly and out of sight of the American public, there hasn’t been an outcry to fix the problem.
The future is even more critical. Artificial intelligence, quantum computing and other advanced technologies have the potential to fundamentally alter the balance of power, and we can’t afford the type of intelligence failures we’ve suffered in the past.
Major changes are needed. The House and Senate Intelligence committees are right to focus on this issue. The rest of Congress must wake up and support their efforts.
Colin Pascal is a retired Army lieutenant colonel and counterintelligence special agent. He commanded the U.S. Army Special Investigations Detachment, served as chief of human intelligence and counterintelligence for Operation Inherent Resolve and as director of operations for the U.S. Army foreign counterintelligence activity.
Copyright 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
More Opinions - National Security News
Gorsuch takes aim at fellow Supreme Court justices in tariff decision
Hegseth says he’ll order random pizzas to throw off monitoring app
White House plays hardball with Democrats over DHS shutdown
Democratic leaders scrambling to prevent repeat of last year’s rowdy State of ...
Senate Democrats unveil proposal to discourage private equity ownership of homes
France bars US ambassador Kushner from meeting government officials
Democrats prepare to protest Trump State of the Union: What to know
Former FBI official: Patel Olympics appearance sends ‘horrible’ message to ...
Here’s how Trump’s polling has changed since last year
Mace on Epstein files: ‘This is much bigger than a prostitution and sex ...
Republicans eye opening for DHS deal this week as Democrats double down
US imposes 10 percent tariff after Trump promises 15 percent rate
Trump puts Iran’s leader in double bind: Capitulation or risk of war
New British ambassador dishes on Trump’s ‘genius,’ post-Mandelson vetting ...
Senate Democrat: Trump has ‘no intention of following’ Constitution on ...
Supreme Court shields Postal Service from lawsuits over intentionally ...
Massie calls for Gonzales to resign: ‘Where are the other men in the GOP?’
GOP members call on Tony Gonzales to resign over alleged affair
2024 Election Results
2024 Election Forecast
Regulation - Administration
Energy & Environment Video Clips
Health Care Video Clips
Technology Video Clips
Transportation Video Clips
International Video Clips
Cybersecurity Video Clips
National Security Video Clips
Contributors to The Hill
Submit Opinion Content
PRIVACY POLICY 09/30/2025
Advertise with Nexstar
Journalistic Integrity
THE HILL 400 N CAPITOL STREET NW, SUITE 650 WASHINGTON DC 20002
© 1998 - 2026 Nexstar Media Inc. | All Rights Reserved.
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Sign in to create a free account. No password needed.
By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.
By clicking on any of the sign up options below, you confirm that you have read and agree to our Terms of Use, which includes a jury trial waiver and class action waiver, and that you have read our Privacy Policy detailing our collection, use and sharing of your personal information.
The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.
Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.
The Hill is provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc., and uses the My Nexstar sign-in, which works across our media network.
Nexstar Media Group, Inc. is a leading, diversified media company that produces and distributes engaging local and national news, sports, and entertainment content across its television and digital platforms. The My Nexstar sign-in works across the Nexstar network—including The CW, NewsNation, The Hill, and more. Learn more at nexstar.tv/privacy-policy.
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Check your email inbox
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Thanks for registering!
Provided by Nexstar Media Group, Inc.
Are you sure you want to log out?