Trump’s takeover of the Kennedy Center should serve as a warning to UK arts institutions |
Into the pale stone wall of the Kennedy Center, above its elegant terrace on the edge of the Potomac river, are carved bold and idealistic sentiments. “This country cannot afford to be materially rich and spiritually poor. To further the appreciation of culture among all the people, to increase respect for the creative individual, to widen participation by all the processes and fulfillments of art – this is one of the fascinating challenges of these days.” Those are the words of John F Kennedy, after whom the US’s national performing arts centre is named. The impulse to build it came from Dwight D Eisenhower; it was given JFK’s name after his assassination; and it opened in 1971, to the music of Leonard Bernstein and the choreography of Alvin Ailey, in the presidency of Richard Nixon. The Kennedy Centre, in short, was designed to be bipartisan, a place of gathering for Democrats and Republicans alike, a proud showcase of the best of America’s dance, opera and music.
For 50 years it carefully trod that line, its board balanced by members of Congress from both sides of the political divide. But it turns out it can take just months to unravel half a century of high-minded purpose.
I have visited the Kennedy Center twice this year – once in the early spring, once in the late autumn. In March, patrons were adjusting to the shock of Donald Trump’s insertion of himself over the organisation – a few weeks earlier he had sacked its Republican chair and had a new, compliant set of trustees vote him in instead. The night I attended, the audience booed the vice-president, JD Vance, at a National Symphony Orchestra concert, which he was attending with his wife Usha, a trustee. The experienced president of the centre had just been replaced with Richard Grenell, an ambassador to Germany under Trump’s first term, a man without any experience in arts administration. Trump and Grenell committed themselves........