Media, 29 Federal Judges Freak Out Over Rude Words In Dissent Attacking Trans Child Abuse |
1 Trending: Trump DOJ Is Finally Taking On The Corrupt DC Bar Association
2 Trending: Report: Online Forums Appear To Allow Kids Access To Cross-Sex Hormones Without Prescription
3 Trending: SCOTUS Finally Cracks Down On The Schools Secretly Transing Kids
4 Trending: 4 Reasons Vote-By-Mail Is Insecure, And How The SAVE Act Would Fix It
Media, 29 Federal Judges Freak Out Over Rude Words In Dissent Attacking Trans Child Abuse
Federal courts have done the worst damage to themselves with a century of outrageous and abusive rulings like this one from the Ninth Circuit.
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
This article quotes crass language for male bodies.
Judge Lawrence VanDyke pre-emptively nuked corporate-media pearl-clutching in his recent dissent from a Ninth Circuit decision forcing a nude, female-only Korean spa frequented by minors to admit men in the name of “trans rights.”
“Squirm as we might, I think it’s only fair for our court to have a small taste of its own medicine,” VanDyke wrote. “Sometimes, ‘dignified’ words are employed to mask a legal abomination.”
This was part of VanDyke’s defense for opening his dissent with: “This is a case about swinging dicks. The Christian owners of Olympus Spa — a traditional Korean, women-only, nude spa — understandably don’t want them in their spa. Their female employees and female clients don’t want them in their spa either. But Washington State insists on them. And now so does the Ninth Circuit.” He continues:
You may think that swinging dicks shouldn’t appear in a judicial opinion. You’re not wrong. But as much as you might understandably be shocked and displeased to merely encounter that phrase in this opinion, I hope we can all agree that it is far more jarring for the unsuspecting and exposed women at Olympus Spa — someo as young as thirteen — to be visually assaulted by the real thing.
You may think that swinging dicks shouldn’t appear in a judicial opinion. You’re not wrong. But as much as you might understandably be shocked and displeased to merely encounter that phrase in this opinion, I hope we can all agree that it is far more jarring for the unsuspecting and exposed women at Olympus Spa — someo as young as thirteen — to be visually assaulted by the real thing.
After VanDyke’s dissent was released on March 12, corporate media mimicked his Ninth Circuit colleagues’ fake horror at crude words used to describe abominable realities.
Reuters went with: “US judges condemn Trump appointee’s ‘vulgar barroom talk’ in their transgender bias case.” The article notes that 27 of VanDyke’s child-hating colleagues on his circuit “denounced........