Australia’s Trans Radicalism Crumbles Under The Weight Of Its Own Absurdity |
1 Trending: Judge Hands Russia Hoaxer Marc Elias Major Loss By Upholding Florida’s New Congressional Map
2 Trending: Motherhood Is Completely At Odds With A Career-Obsessed Society
3 Trending: If 1 In 5 Fairfax Residents Is Illegal, We Need Mass Deportations In Virginia Immediately
4 Trending: The Trump Administration Proposes A Big Expansion Of Hunting Rights On Public Lands
Australia’s Trans Radicalism Crumbles Under The Weight Of Its Own Absurdity
The case of Tickle v. Giggle is the perfect demonstration of what happens when a government decides sex is whatever you say it is.
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
When you tell gigantic whoopers about what it means to be human as male and female, those lies will reveal themselves in grand and embarrassing ways.
This is what’s currently happening with gender ideology in Australia, and it is worth everyone’s attention in both hemispheres. These incidents serve as a grand demonstration in the madness of gender ideology. On Aug. 1, 2013, it became Australian law that a person’s sex was mutable and self-defined. Of course, this erased any objective meaning of what it means to be male or female.
Australia is now dealing with the fallout, and it is comically infuriating.
What has blown things up down under is a case called Tickle v. Giggle. Seriously. A very feisty female tech entrepreneur named Sally (Sall) Grover is being fined serious money by Australia’s federal court for kicking a bloke off her all-female social media site, Giggle for Girls. That man started posing as a woman in his late 40s and now presents as “Roxane (Roxie) Tickle,” trying desperately to pass as a woman. Few are buying it, and Grover certainly didn’t when her company reviewed Tickle’s personal photograph.
Robert James Bromwich, a sitting judge for the Federal Court of Australia, has declared in a legal ruling against Grover that Tickle’s “sex is now that of a woman” because 1) the man said so, 2) he legally changed his birth certificate to denote this wish along with his newly adopted name, and 3) he had sex mutilating........