The New York Times Tries To Gin Up A Hit Piece On The Texas Rangers, But Nobody Cares |
1 Trending: A Drunk Illegal Alien Allegedly Killed Two Young Boys With His Car, But Corporate Media Couldn’t Care Less
2 Trending: House GOP Demands ActBlue Forfeit Info About ‘Unserious’ Efforts To Stop Foreign Donations
3 Trending: Exclusive: Virginia School District Encourages Student Commitment To DEI As Major Achievement Metric
4 Trending: The ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ Is A Pathetic Joke
The New York Times Tries To Gin Up A Hit Piece On The Texas Rangers, But Nobody Cares
Blum quotes precisely one fan from the stadium, who says, actual quote, “I think it’s a good thing.” See all the CONTROVERSY!?!?!?!?
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
Watch how they did it, because the old technique just slammed into a wall.
The sports section at the New York Times, which carries the painfully twee name “The Athletic,” just tried to provoke a cancellation. Everybody just made fun of them. The Silicon Valley entrepreneur Marc Andreessen recently told us that the cultural engine of the hit piece was dead, and with the exception of left-on-left hits like the one on the ghost of Cesar Chavez, he was right.
It's incredible the extent to which the social sanctioning engine has simply seized up. Hit pieces that would have been 5-alarm fires 5 years ago now come and go with no notice. Nobody cares, it's over.— Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 (@pmarca) April 9, 2026
It's incredible the extent to which the social sanctioning engine has simply seized up. Hit pieces that would have been 5-alarm fires 5 years ago now come and go with no notice. Nobody cares, it's over.
The Athletic was specifically shocked and outraged that a baseball team, the Texas Rangers, installed a statue at their stadium of a, how can I say this, Texas Ranger. This, reporter Sam Blum announced, was a huge mystery. Why would they do such a controversial thing? Why would the Rangers have a Ranger?
The source of the supposed controversy is that........