The Democrat Party Correctly Rejects Its Useless 2024 Post-Mortem |
1 Trending: Why Thomas Massie Lost
2 Trending: John Cornyn’s Failure To Fight For The SAVE Act Cost Him Trump’s Endorsement
3 Trending: If Beating China At AI Is Paramount, Why Are We Training Their Students At Our Universities?
4 Trending: Unlimited Abortion Threatens Women’s Lives, Not Pro-Life Protections
The Democrat Party Correctly Rejects Its Useless 2024 Post-Mortem
This is what consultant-driven politics looks like, and it’s stale enough to bundle off to the landfill.
Share Article on Facebook
Share Article on Twitter
Share Article on Truth Social
Share Article via Email
I agree with the Democrat Party.
After they lost the presidential election in 2024, Democrats commissioned an after-action report that was supposed to explain where they had gone wrong. This week, DNC Chair Ken Martin rejected the report, explaining his decision online: “I am not proud of this product; it does not meet my standards, and it won’t meet your standards. I don’t endorse what’s in this report, or what’s left out of it. I could not in good faith put the DNC’s stamp of approval on it.” He’s not wrong.
Martin also released the rejected report, wisely, preventing speculation by showing everyone the thing he was rejecting. You can read the Democrat Party’s 2024 rejected postmortem here.
The report offers a fascinating insight into the problem of the consultant class that steers our political campaigns in both major parties. It was reportedly written by longtime Democrat consultant Paul Rivera, who has declined to comment on the rejection of the report by his party. This is how they think. It’s a 192-page window into what professional political consultants think that politics is.
Start with the shopworn slogans. What did Democrats lack? This: “a new, forward-thinking electoral strategy.” Democrats need to “reclaim the vital........