1 Trending: Why Hollywood Has No Successors For Dolly, Curry, Or Cullen

2 Trending: Media Lies About ‘Infinitesimally Rare’ Noncitizen Voting Are A Load Of Bull Hockey

3 Trending: Democrats Invite Women To Freeze Their Eggs So They Can Go Fight Wars

4 Trending: 10 Ways You’re Wasting Money At The Grocery Store And What To Do Instead

Livestreaming Trials Emboldens Lawyers Like Lindsay Clancy’s To Act Out For Clicks

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The judge overseeing the Lindsay Clancy case declared a mistrial Friday after only a single juror prevented a unanimous verdict, purportedly because he was willing to convict the self-admitted baby killer. In a seeming bid to discredit the juror, Clancy’s defense attorney, Kevin Reddington, appeared to suggest the holdout juror might be bigoted against disabled persons.

“I further raise the issue of the American[s] with Disabilities Act. I believe that this is a situation where there is a clear and present danger that this individual, for some reason — what it is we don’t know — but is, is taking a position that’s intractable, regardless of proof beyond a reasonable doubt,” Reddington said.

To be clear, there is no evidence that the holdout has anything to do with the fact that Clancy is in a wheelchair (a result of her jumping out the window and paralyzing herself after slaughtering her kids). There is a good chance the juror is holding out because he finds murder wrong. But that matters naught. Reddington’s bizarre suggestion is the reality of livestreaming hearings.

Clancy is on trial for murdering her three children, Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and........

© The Federalist