California Bar Strips John Eastman Of Livelihood For Representing A Client With Views It Dislikes

1 Trending: Pro-Life Advocate Wins First Amendment Victory After Being Arrested By Biden Administration

2 Trending: The New York Times Tries To Gin Up A Hit Piece On The Texas Rangers, But Nobody Cares

3 Trending: The Iran War Threatens To Pull The Plug On American Farming’s Life Support

4 Trending: Democrats Can’t Update Their Script On The Iran War To Incorporate New Realities

California Bar Strips John Eastman Of Livelihood For Representing A Client With Views It Dislikes

Stripping Eastman of his livelihood sends a chilling message that representing a client with the ‘wrong’ views is career suicide in Democrat-led states.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The California Supreme Court upheld the disbarment of constitutional scholar and attorney John Eastman on Wednesday for representing President Donald Trump when he questioned the outcome of the 2020 election.

The California State Bar’s Office of Chief Trial Counsel investigated Eastman for advising Trump following the 2020 election. The bar association argued Eastman violated “ethical obligations” by representing Trump in the questioning of the 2020 election. As States United wrote, the bar alleged Eastman tried to “plan,  promote, and assist then-President Trump in executing a strategy, unsupported by facts or law, to overturn the legitimate results of the 2020 presidential election by obstructing the count of electoral votes of certain states.”

But this had nothing to do with “ethics” or even “crime,” and a review of the 11........

© The Federalist