menu_open Columnists
We use cookies to provide some features and experiences in QOSHE

More information  .  Close

White House: Iran Gets Nothing Unless It Gets Rid Of Its Nuclear Stockpile

11 0
24.05.2026

1 Trending: The Democrat Party Correctly Rejects Its Useless 2024 Post-Mortem

2 Trending: In Hearing On Court-Packing’s Partisan Perils, Not A Single Democrat Disavowed It

3 Trending: Stephen Colbert Wasn’t Funny. Even Worse, He Wasn’t Interesting

4 Trending: House Judiciary Subpoenas SPLC For Communications With Racist Groups It Allegedly Funded

White House: Iran Gets Nothing Unless It Gets Rid Of Its Nuclear Stockpile

‘We’re structuring this in such a way where they make commitments on the enriched stockpile, but they don’t get a dime unless they deliver on their commitments,’ the senior official stated.

Share Article on Facebook

Share Article on Twitter

Share Article on Truth Social

Share Article via Email

The Trump administration’s negotiations with Iran do not include any pathway for the country to obtain a nuclear weapon, nor will any potential deal give Iran “billions of dollars” in no-strings-attached handouts, a senior administration official said Sunday, despite some Republican warmongers claiming otherwise.

The senior official said that there will be zero resources to Iranians unless and until they give up highly enriched uranium, stating, “no dust, no dollars.”

When reports about a deal with the Iranians came out last week, some hardline Republicans like Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Ted Cruz, R-Texas, who appear uninterested in seeing an end to the conflict, quickly took to social media to countersignal the deal.

“I am deeply concerned about what we are hearing about an Iran ‘deal,’ being pushed by some voices in the administration,” Cruz said. “If the result of all that [military action] is to be an Iranian regime — still run by Islamists who chant ‘death to America’ — now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake.”

“If a deal is struck to end the Iranian conflict because it is believed that the Strait of Hormuz cannot be protected from Iranian terrorism and Iran still possesses the capability to destroy major Gulf oil infrastructure, then Iran will be perceived as being a dominate [sic] force requiring a diplomatic solution,” Graham said.........

© The Federalist