Regressive jirgas
The federal government's recent move to revive the jirga system in the newly merged districts of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa is not just regressive, but also unconstitutional and dangerously reminiscent of the colonial-era governance. A committee led by the Federal Minister for Kashmir Affairs and Gilgit-Baltistan has been formed to explore alternative justice systems in these districts, raising fears of a de facto rollback of the 25th Constitutional Amendment, which integrated the former tribal areas into Pakistan's legal and administrative mainstream and abolished the jirga system — a move celebrated as a step towards constitutional equality, rule of law, and human rights for the region's long-neglected population.
Nonetheless, the initiative to reinstate this system signals not only a betrayal of the promises made to the tribal population but also a troubling attempt to offload state responsibility for justice onto a parallel, informal, and often brutal institution.
Undoubtedly, jirgas operate entirely outside the constitutional framework and the rule of........





















Toi Staff
Sabine Sterk
Gideon Levy
Penny S. Tee
Mark Travers Ph.d
John Nosta
Daniel Orenstein
Rachel Marsden