Oceania | Diplomacy | Oceania

Australia, International Broadcasting, and the Maintenance of Regional Trust

Australia must decide whether to remain an active, trusted participant in regional discourse or to relinquish that role to competing actors. 

As the United States withdraws its media involvement in Asia and the Pacific, and China increases its regional engagement, Australia confronts a significant test of its ability to remain a preferred partner in the Indo-Pacific. This challenge reaches beyond traditional domains such as defense and diplomacy to include education, media, and the provision of reliable information.

Influence in the Pacific cannot be attributed solely to material capabilities. Instead, it is established through sustained presence, reciprocal communication, and the cultivation of respect. The critical questions concern not only which actors exercise power, but also which actors listen, engage in dialogue rather than act unilaterally, and maintain steady engagement regardless of immediate strategic benefits.

These considerations become more urgent given the impending conclusion of funding for the Pacific Security and Engagement Initiatives (PSEI), administered by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). Established as a first-phase program, PSEI has provided AU$32 million over four years; its continuation is uncertain. This uncertainty is especially notable in light of the British government’s recent resolution to increase funding for the BBC World Service by 11 million pounds annually over the next three years, representing a total increase of 33 million pounds and an 8 percent rise over the previous allocation.

Australia’s current predicament is not without precedent. During John Howard’s administration, between 1996 and 2007, international broadcasting to the Pacific was substantially reduced. Key Radio Australia transmission infrastructure was leased to a private religious organization at below-maintenance cost. After complaints, the Howard government was forced to buy back time on the leased new service for a few hours of broadcast time per week. 

Television services experienced comparable disruption. In 1998, a government contract awarded to the Seven Network to operate an Asian broadcasting service devolved into a commercially oriented model that ultimately proved unsustainable, culminating in the license being relinquished.

Contemporaneous critiques by media professionals and economists correctly identified the absence of commercial viability in international broadcasting. However, such analyses misapprehended its fundamental purpose. International broadcasting functions as an instrument of soft or strategic power, oriented toward trust-building rather than profit generation. The continuing success of Radio New Zealand Pacific illustrates the lasting advantages of consistent, respectful engagement with regional audiences.

Australia’s subsequent policy adjustment, as exemplified by PSEI, aimed to restore this capacity. By developing locally informed, bespoke content, the ABC re-established a regional presence based on partnership rather than projection, illustrating a shift from one-way communication to collaborative engagement.

The ABC’s comparative advantage derives from its multi-platform distribution model, which includes radio, television, digital platforms, and third-party dissemination channels. This structure enables the dissemination of content to diverse audiences, including those who may be skeptical of Australian policy intentions.

Empirical evidence indicates a strong demand for independent journalism within the Pacific. Digital media platforms such as The Pacific Newsroom have achieved significant audience reach, highlighting both a shortage of trusted information sources and a wider crisis of media credibility in the region. In this context, bespoke content becomes a critical factor. Most of this programming is currently funded through PSEI and distributed by the ABC; discontinuation would substantially limit Australia’s capacity to communicate effectively.

Ending PSEI funding would have consequences that go beyond institutional budgetary concerns. It would likely result in a return to a less effective engagement model, characterized by infrastructural presence without substantive content, thereby reintroducing communication approaches perceived as externally imposed rather than locally relevant.

These dynamics should be understood within the context of a developing geopolitical environment. Freedom House has documented the expansion of Chinese media influence under Xi Jinping, noting systematic efforts to shape global information ecosystems. Across the Indo-Pacific, partnerships between Chinese state-linked entities and local media organizations frequently involve content-sharing arrangements with varying degrees of editorial influence. Investigations by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), for example, have identified cases in which funding for regional media outlets was contingent on favorable coverage.

Simultaneously, the withdrawal of United States funding for journalism initiatives has changed the donor landscape, leaving Australia as the only actor with sufficient scale to exercise significant influence in support of independent media in the region. Although New Zealand and BBC Media Action have expanded their activities, their resources remain comparatively limited.

The Pacific information environment is increasingly vulnerable to misinformation and disinformation, especially during electoral processes, public health emergencies, and periods of political instability. The ABC fulfils an essential role in reducing these risks by providing reliable information and promoting professional journalistic standards.

This function is especially important during periods of crisis. In situations involving pandemic-related misinformation, natural disasters, or political tension, the presence of trusted communicators and established dissemination channels is essential. The increasing frequency of such information emergencies indicates that this role will become more significant over time.

Australia’s credibility as a partner in the Indo-Pacific has historically been undermined by inconsistent funding and policy discontinuities. Initiatives such as PSEI have partially restored trust; however, discontinuing funding risks reversing these gains.

The human consequence of these policy shifts requires careful consideration. PSEI has enabled the recruitment of Pacific and Pasifika journalists and media professionals, thereby enhancing regional representation and domestic inclusivity. Large-scale redundancies would disrupt institutional capacity and signal a reduced commitment to equitable partnership.

Furthermore, the implications extend beyond the Pacific. Media development initiatives in Timor-Leste and Indonesia, which serve as channels for broader regional engagement, would likely be negatively affected.

The challenge facing Australia concerns not only budgetary allocation but also strategic orientation. Influence based on respect and sustained engagement is both cumulative and fragile. In an increasingly contested information environment, disengagement does not equate to neutrality; instead, it creates a vacuum that other actors are prepared to fill.

Australia must therefore decide whether to remain an active, trusted participant in regional discourse or to relinquish that role to competing actors. This distinction will be apparent to Pacific audiences. 

Get to the bottom of the story

Subscribe today and join thousands of diplomats, analysts, policy professionals and business readers who rely on The Diplomat for expert Asia-Pacific coverage.

Get unlimited access to in-depth analysis you won't find anywhere else, from South China Sea tensions to ASEAN diplomacy to India-Pakistan relations. More than 5,000 articles a year.

Unlimited articles and expert analysis

Weekly newsletter with exclusive insights

16-year archive of diplomatic coverage

Ad-free reading on all devices

Support independent journalism

Already have an account? Log in.

As the United States withdraws its media involvement in Asia and the Pacific, and China increases its regional engagement, Australia confronts a significant test of its ability to remain a preferred partner in the Indo-Pacific. This challenge reaches beyond traditional domains such as defense and diplomacy to include education, media, and the provision of reliable information.

Influence in the Pacific cannot be attributed solely to material capabilities. Instead, it is established through sustained presence, reciprocal communication, and the cultivation of respect. The critical questions concern not only which actors exercise power, but also which actors listen, engage in dialogue rather than act unilaterally, and maintain steady engagement regardless of immediate strategic benefits.

These considerations become more urgent given the impending conclusion of funding for the Pacific Security and Engagement Initiatives (PSEI), administered by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC). Established as a first-phase program, PSEI has provided AU$32 million over four years; its continuation is uncertain. This uncertainty is especially notable in light of the British government’s recent resolution to increase funding for the BBC World Service by 11 million pounds annually over the next three years, representing a total increase of 33 million pounds and an 8 percent rise over the previous allocation.

Australia’s current predicament is not without precedent. During John Howard’s administration, between 1996 and 2007, international broadcasting to the Pacific was substantially reduced. Key Radio Australia transmission infrastructure was leased to a private religious organization at below-maintenance cost. After complaints, the Howard government was forced to buy back time on the leased new service for a few hours of broadcast time per week. 

Television services experienced comparable disruption. In 1998, a government contract awarded to the Seven Network to operate an Asian broadcasting service devolved into a commercially oriented model that ultimately proved unsustainable, culminating in the license being relinquished.

Contemporaneous critiques by media professionals and economists correctly identified the absence of commercial viability in international broadcasting. However, such analyses misapprehended its fundamental purpose. International broadcasting functions as an instrument of soft or strategic power, oriented toward trust-building rather than profit generation. The continuing success of Radio New Zealand Pacific illustrates the lasting advantages of consistent, respectful engagement with regional audiences.

Australia’s subsequent policy adjustment, as exemplified by PSEI, aimed to restore this capacity. By developing locally informed, bespoke content, the ABC re-established a regional presence based on partnership rather than projection, illustrating a shift from one-way communication to collaborative engagement.

The ABC’s comparative advantage derives from its multi-platform distribution model, which includes radio, television, digital platforms, and third-party dissemination channels. This structure enables the dissemination of content to diverse audiences, including those who may be skeptical of Australian policy intentions.

Empirical evidence indicates a strong demand for independent journalism within the Pacific. Digital media platforms such as The Pacific Newsroom have achieved significant audience reach, highlighting both a shortage of trusted information sources and a wider crisis of media credibility in the region. In this context, bespoke content becomes a critical factor. Most of this programming is currently funded through PSEI and distributed by the ABC; discontinuation would substantially limit Australia’s capacity to communicate effectively.

Ending PSEI funding would have consequences that go beyond institutional budgetary concerns. It would likely result in a return to a less effective engagement model, characterized by infrastructural presence without substantive content, thereby reintroducing communication approaches perceived as externally imposed rather than locally relevant.

These dynamics should be understood within the context of a developing geopolitical environment. Freedom House has documented the expansion of Chinese media influence under Xi Jinping, noting systematic efforts to shape global information ecosystems. Across the Indo-Pacific, partnerships between Chinese state-linked entities and local media organizations frequently involve content-sharing arrangements with varying degrees of editorial influence. Investigations by the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), for example, have identified cases in which funding for regional media outlets was contingent on favorable coverage.

Simultaneously, the withdrawal of United States funding for journalism initiatives has changed the donor landscape, leaving Australia as the only actor with sufficient scale to exercise significant influence in support of independent media in the region. Although New Zealand and BBC Media Action have expanded their activities, their resources remain comparatively limited.

The Pacific information environment is increasingly vulnerable to misinformation and disinformation, especially during electoral processes, public health emergencies, and periods of political instability. The ABC fulfils an essential role in reducing these risks by providing reliable information and promoting professional journalistic standards.

This function is especially important during periods of crisis. In situations involving pandemic-related misinformation, natural disasters, or political tension, the presence of trusted communicators and established dissemination channels is essential. The increasing frequency of such information emergencies indicates that this role will become more significant over time.

Australia’s credibility as a partner in the Indo-Pacific has historically been undermined by inconsistent funding and policy discontinuities. Initiatives such as PSEI have partially restored trust; however, discontinuing funding risks reversing these gains.

The human consequence of these policy shifts requires careful consideration. PSEI has enabled the recruitment of Pacific and Pasifika journalists and media professionals, thereby enhancing regional representation and domestic inclusivity. Large-scale redundancies would disrupt institutional capacity and signal a reduced commitment to equitable partnership.

Furthermore, the implications extend beyond the Pacific. Media development initiatives in Timor-Leste and Indonesia, which serve as channels for broader regional engagement, would likely be negatively affected.

The challenge facing Australia concerns not only budgetary allocation but also strategic orientation. Influence based on respect and sustained engagement is both cumulative and fragile. In an increasingly contested information environment, disengagement does not equate to neutrality; instead, it creates a vacuum that other actors are prepared to fill.

Australia must therefore decide whether to remain an active, trusted participant in regional discourse or to relinquish that role to competing actors. This distinction will be apparent to Pacific audiences. 

Kevin McQuillan is a member of the Australia Asia-Pacific Media Initiative and founding Editor of Radio NZ International, 1989-91. 

Australian Broadcasting Corporation

© The Diplomat