David Hegg | Easter and Ethics |
Back in the 1960s, Joseph Fletcher, an Episcopal clergyman, proposed a new approach to ethics. Built on the assertion that love is the only absolute, Fletcher declared certain ethical norms can be violated if love dictates. This came to be known as “situational ethics.” While few could argue with the priority of love, this approach quickly deteriorated into pragmatism. The individual could decide how love factored into the situation and do as he pleased. Fletcher and his adherents were unable to quantify love, or better, they could not determine its rightful object. Love for what? Personal happiness or societal benefit? Love for truth or love for expediency?
Situational ethics has had an uncertain academic life since Fletcher’s sincere attempt to champion love. Today, it is seldom studied or discussed. But it is nevertheless prevalent in our daily lives. It is actively in play, and we can dispense with the fancy title and label it for what it is: an ethical compromise.
Today is Easter for many, Resurrection Sunday for some, and just another day to eat with family for still others. What started out as a Christian religious celebration of the resurrection of Jesus has dissipated into other things. My point is........