4 Supreme Court decisions that have quietly jumpstarted Project 2025
Project 2025, Donald Trump’s authoritarian playbook on Christian nationalism, is already in motion. While the media debates Trump’s disingenuous disavowals of the master plan, the real story is the extent to which the Supreme Court has already begun implementing it.
Project 2025 seeks to degrade civil rights nationwide by outlawing abortion, mandating Christianity and reducing LGBT citizens to second class status.
But these culture war flashpoints are merely a ruse, a distraction to disguise the real objective: Project 2025 is a massive undertaking financed by fossil fuel wealth to protect fossil fuels, abetted by Supreme Court justices with deep ties to Big Oil.
While many pundits have acknowledged the implausibility of Trump’s “lack of knowledge” about Project 2025, few have noted that the Supreme Court has already begun to implement its key objectives:
Bribery: SCOTUS implemented Project 2025’s deference to a strong (and crooked) chief executive in Snyder v. the United States. Republicans on the Supreme Court declared in Snyder that bribing an elected official isn’t bribery if it’s paid to the official after the fact, because then it’s really more of a “gratuity.” Despite (because of?) two justices facing backlash for accepting lavish gifts from donors with cases before the Supreme........
© Salon
visit website