No vote, no war? Congress to challenge Trump on Iran strikes |
Reviews Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary? Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting
Getting Hooked on Quitting
Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary?
Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
Is College Necessary?
Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Reviews Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary? Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Lifestyle The New Sober Boom Getting Hooked on Quitting
Getting Hooked on Quitting
Education Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous Is College Necessary?
Liberal Arts Cuts Are Dangerous
Is College Necessary?
Finance Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Dying Parents Costing Millennials Dear
Gen Z Investing In Le Creuset
Crypto Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
Investing SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters ‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
SEC vs Celebrity Crypto Promoters
‘Dark’ Personalities Drawn to BTC
No vote, no war? Congress to challenge Trump on Iran strikes
Lawmakers demand war powers vote arguing the White House bypassed Congress in launching military action in Iran
Published February 28, 2026 3:00PM (EST)
The United States’ role in the broad military operation against Iran has sparked an urgent political and legal showdown in United States Congress over the constitutional authority to take the nation to war.
President Donald Trump announced early Saturday that U.S. forces had joined Israel in coordinated strikes targeting Iranian military and nuclear sites. The president called the operation “major combat operations” aimed at eliminating threats from Tehran’s nuclear and missile programs and urged Iranians to rise against their government.
Unlike formal declarations of war that historically required approval from Congress under Article I of the U.S. Constitution, Mr. Trump did not request a formal congressional authorization before ordering the strikes. Critics say this marks a significant expansion of executive military power and raised immediate legal concerns among lawmakers.
Under the 1973 War Powers Resolution — legislation meant to check presidential war-making authority — the president must notify Congress within 48 hours of initiating military action and seek approval if operations extend beyond 60 days. Administration officials contend that Mr. Trump complied with the notification requirement by briefing the bipartisan “Gang of Eight” group of congressional leaders ahead of the operation, including through Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
But many lawmakers — led by Democrats and a handful of Republicans — argue that the strikes amount to “war” and should be approved by Congress before continuing. Sen. Tim Kaine, Rep. Ro Khanna and others called for an immediate war powers vote when lawmakers return to session, saying Americans have a right to weigh in on whether sustained military engagement is appropriate. Rep. Thomas Massie and other critics are pushing similar measures.
House Speaker Mike Johnson expressed support for the president’s action, while House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries vowed Democrats will seek a formal vote on military authorization next week.
Start your day with essential news from Salon. Sign up for our free morning newsletter, Crash Course.
The debate highlights longstanding tensions over the balance of war powers in the U.S. and comes as the conflict with Iran continues to unfold, with civilian casualties mounting and global partners expressing alarm. Historically, Iran’s 1979 revolution transformed it from a U.S.-aligned monarchy to an adversarial theocratic state — a legacy that shapes today’s fears about protracted conflict and regional destabilization.
This situation remains fluid and developing, with legal challenges and international reactions continuing to evolve.
US and Israel strike Iran in major escalation and possible regime change
Trump’s Iran threats echo Bush’s macho Iraq playbook
Iran’s protests have gone quiet. But the revolution isn’t over
Related Topics ------------------------------------------
Copyright © 2026 Salon.com, LLC. Reproduction of material from any Salon pages without written permission is strictly prohibited. SALON ® is registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office as a trademark of Salon.com, LLC. Associated Press articles: Copyright © 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
By subscribing, you agree that Salon will automatically charge you at the then-current rate (currently $9.95/month or $95/year) each month/year until you cancel. Log in to your account anytime to cancel prior to renewal date and avoid future charges.
Your current signup type is