A Limited Supreme Court Win for Trump on Mail-In Ballots |
Supreme Court
A Limited Supreme Court Win for Trump on Mail-In Ballots
But the legal fighting will continue in the lower courts.
Damon Root | 8.25.2026 9:45 AM
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
(Photo: Sipa USA/Newscom/Kilmermedia/Dreamstime)
In its recent decision in Watson v. Republican National Committee (2026), the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the legality of a state mail-in voting system that allows the counting of ballots that are mailed before election day but not received until shortly after election day. "While federal law dictates when ballots must be cast," observed the majority opinion of Justice Amy Coney Barrett, "state law governs when they must be received." It was a clear rebuke to the Republican-led effort to eliminate a common form of voting by mail.
But if you thought that far-reaching decision would be the Supreme Court's final word on mail-in ballots this year, you may want to think again.
You’re reading Injustice System from Damon Root and Reason. Get more of Damon’s commentary on constitutional law and American history.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Email(Required)
SUBSCRIBE
Back in March, President Donald Trump issued an executive order that, among other things, directed the Postal Service to promulgate new rules that would restrict the ability to send and........