Take our Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Test

Find a therapist to heal from trauma.

Push-pull cycles form when one seeks closeness and the other withdraws, and previous trauma can intensify it.

Trauma sensitivity can detect real disconnection, but it is often dismissed as overreacting.

Change begins when both partners recognize the cycle and take shared responsibility for shifting it.

Most people hope that, after years together, their relationship will feel comfortable. But for some couples, this ease never arrives. The way you and your partner interact can shape how you see yourself and what love means.

Sara and Mark’s story shows how these patterns can play out.

Sara grew up in an unpredictable and abusive home. Affection was inconsistent and often withdrawn. She only got attention if she begged to be heard or did what others wanted. Over time, she learned to monitor others’ moods to stay safe.

Mark grew up in a stable home, unused to strong emotions. He believed relationships should be easy and saw conflict as a sign that something was wrong.

When Closeness and Distance Collide

Early in their marriage, a push-pull pattern developed. When Mark was affectionate, Sara felt connected. When Sara became emotional, he withdrew, becoming quiet, distracted, and irritable.

For Mark, this was how he coped. For Sara, it was upsetting. When Sara expressed how his withdrawal hurt her, Mark often responded, “You’re too sensitive,” or, “Maybe you should see a therapist again.”

These phrases became routine. Arguments were about more than events. They were about whether Sara’s feelings were valid. The cycle went like this:

Closeness: Mark becomes affectionate or engaged. Sara feels safe enough to share vulnerable thoughts and feelings.

Withdrawal: Mark pulls back, becoming preoccupied or distracted.

Self-Doubt: Sara notices tone and body changes and starts to worry. She asks herself, Am I overreacting? Did I cause this? She responds by crying and trying to talk more.

Attribution to Trauma: Mark becomes frustrated and pulls away further, saying her reactions are due to her trauma or “emotionality.”

Temporary Repair: After arguments and sometimes threats to leave, they reconcile, and Mark reassures her. Then the cycle restarts.

This cycle repeated for years.

The Quiet Strain of Long-Term Cycles

Over time, this push-pull pattern and Mark often blaming Sara’s trauma had strong effects:

Erosion of self-trust: Sara began to doubt her ability to understand emotional signals.

Hyper-vigilance: She watched Mark’s tone, gestures, and mood, hoping to prevent withdrawal.

Over-functioning: She adjusted her behavior to manage the relationship. When she couldn’t and cried, she blamed herself.

Isolation of perception: Even when things didn’t add up, she trusted Mark’s view over her own.

Mark often felt confused. He saw himself as steady and didn’t realize how intense Sara’s feelings were. He thought he was patient, but he was unknowingly reinforcing the cycle and strengthening a trauma bond.1

People who have experienced trauma may feel emotions more strongly, but this sensitivity is not always negative. It can help them notice patterns in how others behave. The problem is when those observations are dismissed as overreactions instead of being taken seriously as information about the relationship. This creates a difficult bind: you may be seeing something real, but you are told that the issue is how you’re seeing it.1

After years of this cycle, this can lead to ongoing self-doubt and a skewed sense of responsibility. The partner who has experienced trauma may become unsure of what or whom to trust.2

Push-Pull Across the Lifespan

In marriages like Sara and Mark’s, the push-pull cycle shifts over time. When their kids were young, withdrawal might have looked like Mark spending more time at work or with friends. In midlife, it could become emotional distance or irritability. By retirement, withdrawal might mean pulling back completely or losing interest in shared activities and goals.

Even as it changes form, the pattern is driven by the same dynamics. For someone with a trauma history, each life stage can bring up previous trauma responses. When moments of warmth follow periods of distance, this pattern can make attachment and hope stronger, which is why the cycle is so hard to break, even after many years.

Take our Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Test

Find a therapist to heal from trauma.

Owning Your Emotional Agency

The goal is not to ignore self-awareness or assume every reaction is right. Instead, it is about learning to trust your sense of patterns. Some helpful questions to ask are:

Are my observations and feelings acknowledged and explored, or dismissed?

Am I taking increasing responsibility for the relational climate?

Do I feel more clarity after conversations, or more confused?

These questions can help you distinguish between your triggers and what is actually happening in the relationship. Both are important and need attention, but they are not the same.

In long-term marriages, these patterns might seem permanent, but with focused effort, change can happen.

Mutual recognition: Both partners begin to see the cycle itself as the problem, rather than each other.

Boundaries and consistency: The partner who tends to withdraw works toward being more predictable and present, while the other practices setting limits around what feels acceptable.

Shared language: Couples come up with words or phrases for their dynamic, making it easier to talk about without blaming each other.

Therapeutic support: A therapist can help create a safe space to slow the cycle down and understand it more clearly.

For couples like Sara and Mark, change does not happen all at once. It often begins with simply noticing the pattern and becoming curious about it, rather than immediately reacting. Without that awareness, the cycle tends to repeat itself.

Real change requires both partners to take responsibility for how they contribute to the dynamic. Research on demand–withdrawal patterns shows these cycles are associated with lower long-term relationship satisfaction, highlighting why addressing them matters.2

Therapist Perspective

Having a trauma history doesn’t mean you’re “too sensitive.” In many cases, it reflects an ability to notice patterns others might miss. The difficulty arises when that awareness is dismissed or when it triggers responses shaped by earlier experiences, such as fighting, fleeing, freezing, or fawning, which are associated with previous trauma responses.

Healing isn’t about getting rid of sensitivity or assigning blame. It involves learning to distinguish between what is coming from past experiences and what is happening in the present, while gradually rebuilding trust in your own perceptions.

1. Bretaña, I., Alonso-Arbiol, I., Recio, P., & Molero, F. (2022). Avoidant attachment, withdrawal-aggression conflict pattern, and relationship satisfaction: A mediational dyadic model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 794942. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794942

2. Heavey, C. L., Christensen, A., & Malamuth, N. M. (1995). The longitudinal impact of demand and withdrawal during marital conflict. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 63(5), 797–801. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7593873/

There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.

By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

© Psychology Today