Threat Isn’t One Thing |
Take our Burnout Test
Find a therapist to overcome stress
Psychology has long assumed that threat makes thinking faster and less careful, but the findings conflict.
A preregistered study of 2,708 people found reasoning scores unchanged by threat, only language shifted.
Climate change prompted more analytical writing, while disease and money worries made it more emotional.
Imagine a simple experiment. You ask two people to do exactly the same thing: Write four sentences about a future in which something has gone badly wrong. You tell the first person to write about climate change. You tell the second to write about a dangerous illness they might catch. The task is identical. Only the threat is different.
When you read what they wrote, the two texts do not feel alike. The climate text tends to be built from longer, connected sentences that reason step by step. The illness text is usually shorter and more emotional. It has more words like I and afraid, and fewer of the small words that link one idea to the next.
This is not just an impression, but the pattern we found in a study of 2,708 people that my colleagues and I published very recently in Applied Cognitive Psychology. And it does not fit the story that psychology has told about threat for a long time.
That story is simple. When people feel threatened, their thinking speeds up and becomes less careful. Slow, step-by-step reasoning gives way to quick, automatic reactions.
Past Research on How Threat Affects Thinking
There is real evidence behind this idea. Reminders of death, the threat of terrorism, and the pressure of scarcity have all been linked to less careful thinking. Mani and colleagues (2013) showed that worrying about money uses up mental resources that people would otherwise spend on other problems. Threat, the story says, makes us think worse.
The problem is that the research has never fully agreed with itself.
Terror Management Theory says that a reminder of death makes people hold on to........