Take our Do I Need Therapy?

Find a therapist near me

Political discourse has entered therapy sessions in a way that has become toxic for many patients.

A lack of therapist adherence to strong boundaries around political discussion can harm patients.

Long-term, carefully nurtured treatments can suddenly rupture amid political differences.

In recent months, I have heard of many instances in which therapeutic boundaries were crossed during discussions of geopolitical events. A particularly charged current schism involves opposing stances between patients and therapists on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Both patients and therapists feel passionately about issues pertaining to Gaza, Israel, Zionism, racism and genocide. To the detriment of patients, this has led to the sudden rupture of long-term, thoughtfully nurtured treatments.

Instead of therapy being a supportive refuge where individuals can process intense and painful feelings, it has become for some a place where patients feel judged and criticized. Many patients are devastated about what has happened to people with whom they feel a sense of belonging and connection. When therapists abandon their neutrality with expressions of disgust or apathy toward a patient, this is a boundary violation. Such violations cause real harm to patients. Some patients who have experienced this antipathy from therapists have abruptly terminated treatment, feeling traumatized and betrayed.

The Sanctity of Therapist Neutrality

A strong therapeutic alliance and firm boundaries are critical for the success of treatment. In 1912, Freud adopted John Locke’s concept of tabula rasa or “blank slate” as a central therapeutic technique. Freud recommended that therapists purposefully conceal details about their own lives and beliefs in order to facilitate patients' access to their........

© Psychology Today