An Introspective Test of Global Workspace Theory |
Global Workspace Theory is among the most influential scientific theories of consciousness. Its central claim is: You consciously experience something if and only if it's being broadly broadcast in a "global workspace" so that many parts of your mind can access it at once — speech, deliberate action, explicit reasoning, memory formation, and so on. Because the workspace has very limited capacity, only a few things can occupy it at any one moment.
Therefore, if Global Workspace Theory is correct, conscious experience should be sparse. Almost everything happening in your sensory systems right now — the feeling of your shirt on your back, the hum of traffic in the distance, the aftertaste of coffee, the posture of your knees — should be processed entirely nonconsciously unless it is currently the topic of attention.
This is a strong, testable prediction of the theory. And it seems like the test should be extremely easy! Just do a little introspection. Is your experience (a.) narrow and attention-bound or (b.) an abundant welter far outrunning attention? If (b) is correct, Global Workspace Theory is refuted from the comfort of our armchairs.[1]
The experiential gap between the two possibilities is huge. Shouldn't the difference be as obvious as peering through a keyhole versus standing in an open field?
Most people, I've found, do find the answer obvious. The problem is: They find it obvious in different directions. Some find it obvious that experience is a welter. Others find it obvious that experience contains only a few items at a time. We could assume that everyone is right about their own experience and wrong only if they generalize to........