By Debra Mashek, Ph.D., and Nina Bianchi
While mergers and acquisitions may make sound business sense, they also kick up incredible collaboration challenges for team members and leaders alike.
Previously rote workflows become unfamiliar. The company’s north star becomes a dim point in a complicated constellation of competing visions. There are new colleagues to meet and work with, new systems to learn, and multiple product lines and databases to integrate. As team size increases, so too does the pressure to deliver more, and faster.
Changes to job titles, descriptions, and logos challenge individual and team identities. Turfiness, attachment to our way of doing things, and us-versus-them thinking impede team building. Redundancies in roles and skills put everyone on alert to the possibility of layoffs, fueling competition rather than connection. And, research published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior suggests that team members' reactions to change fluctuate over time.
All these moving parts mean that mergers test even the most seasoned leaders. This is true across sectors and at all levels of an organization.
If you’re trying to lead within this complex black hole, how can you solve for constant change and uncertainty?
To answer this question, let’s revisit a classic story from field biology.
In 1848, naturalist RS Edleston spotted a peculiar moth in the city of Manchester. Whereas other moths in the area were white, this unique moth was almost entirely black. Over time, naturalists observed an increasing proportion of black moths. By the turn of the century, the vast majority of moths were black, rather than white.
Why is that? As the industrial revolution took hold, factory pollution darkened the trees where the moths lived. The dark moths became more difficult to spot by hungry birds. The white moths became an easy snack. Natural selection provided a survival advantage to moths whose features fit well within that changed environment.
What does this little biology lesson have to do with your ability to lead within the complexity and constant change of a merger? Leadership characteristics celebrated in the old environment—command and control, competition as king, concentrated power—may be a survival disadvantage in the new environment.
Thankfully, unlike the Manchester moths that were doomed if they didn’t happen to have the right characteristics at the right time, leaders can intentionally level up collaborative capacity. How?
First, you can develop your collaboration chops through intentional self-development, a point Deb Mashek (one of the authors of this article) makes in her book Collabor(h)ate.
Second, you can elevate the people in your midst who are well-equipped to nurture relationships and to craft the organizational conditions for collaboration to flourish. These people are critical to helping your organization thrive, not just survive, in this new environment.
As you look within your organization, ask these four questions:
Who thrives when multiple environments have been haphazardly merged? The collaborators. They bring unparalleled value to the organizations they serve. And organizations that optimize for these characteristics thrive amid complexity and change.
A special case of survival of the fittest, this is collaboration of the fittest.
Nina Bianchi is a consultant in health culture transformation. She has been a White House Fellow with Biden Cancer Moonshot, a consultant with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and innovative healthcare and life-science entities.
References
Belschak, F. D., Jacobs, G., Giessner, S. R., Horton, K. E., & Bayerl, P. S. (2020). When the going gets tough: Employee reactions to large‐scale organizational change and the role of employee Machiavellianism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 41(9), 830–850. https://doi-org.ccl.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/job.2478
Mashek, D. (2023). Collabor(h)ate: How to build incredible collaborative relationships at work (even if you'd rather work alone). Great Britain: Practical Inspiration Publishing.
Leading Through a Merger? Collaboration of the Fittest
21
0
25.03.2023
By Debra Mashek, Ph.D., and Nina Bianchi
While mergers and acquisitions may make sound business sense, they also kick up incredible collaboration challenges for team members and leaders alike.
Previously rote workflows become unfamiliar. The company’s north star becomes a dim point in a complicated constellation of competing visions. There are new colleagues to meet and work with, new systems to learn, and multiple product lines and databases to integrate. As team size increases, so too does the pressure to deliver more, and faster.
Changes to job titles, descriptions, and logos challenge individual and team identities. Turfiness, attachment to our way of doing things, and us-versus-them thinking impede team building. Redundancies in roles and skills put everyone on alert to the possibility of layoffs, fueling competition rather than connection. And, research published in the Journal of Organizational Behavior suggests that team members' reactions to change fluctuate over time.
All these........
© Psychology Today
visit website
login
who are we?
contact us
qosheapp
Toi Staff
Gideon Levy
Marwan Bishara
Mort Laitner
Andrew Mitrovica
Grant Arthur Gochin
Priyamvada Gopal
Poonam Muttreja
Obaid Mir
Patrick Gathara
Zaher Sahloul
