Simplistic discussions often claim therapy can be whatever a person wants it to be.

Real therapy involves discussing how a person feels emotionally and how they think.

People wanting therapy but avoiding emotions are often influenced by false views about emotions.

Emotions are simply facts about how a person processes the world; therapy helps address those facts.

If there is one thing decades of practicing therapy have taught me, it is this: Talking about emotions in therapy is not optional.

Yet people often try to convince themselves that it should be. I frequently meet individuals who say they want therapy to help them change their lives, but they also insist that they would rather not talk about their emotions. Sometimes this expectation comes from their own assumptions, and sometimes it comes from things they have read or heard about therapy. I have even seen therapists online suggest that if a therapist asks a client to discuss emotions, the therapist is failing to respect the client’s perspective.

That claim sounds compassionate. It is also misleading.

Psychotherapy involves talking about emotional responses as well as thoughts and experiences. That is not a matter of a therapist imposing their viewpoint. It is simply part of what the process is. Saying you want therapy but do not want to talk about emotions is a bit like going to a medical doctor and saying, “I want help, but I would rather not talk about how I feel physically.” The request misunderstands the nature of the service being provided.

This confusion is often fueled by the way therapy is sometimes presented in overly simplistic ways. It has become common to hear statements that therapy can be “whatever the client wants it to be.” Of course, therapists should respect the goals and perspectives of the people they work with. But respect does not mean pretending that psychotherapy has no basic components. Every helping profession has certain realities built into it, and one of the central realities of psychotherapy is discussing feelings.

I have had clients tell me, sometimes with a bit of surprise, that they did not expect the first session to feel so personal. They did not expect the questions to go so directly into their experiences and reactions. When that happens, my first thought is usually simple: What exactly did they think therapy was going to involve? If someone did not expect to talk about their personal experiences, reactions, and emotions, then what did they expect to do in therapy?

Something similar happens with people who tell me they have already seen several therapists “who could not help them.” Sometimes that is indeed the case. But at other times, it becomes clear that the difficulty may have been less about the therapist and more about the expectations the person brought into therapy. If someone comes in hoping for change while avoiding discussion of the experiences and emotions that shape their life, the process will stall before it has even begun.

None of this is meant as a criticism of people who hesitate to talk about emotions. That hesitation is understandable. In fact, much of it comes from what many people have been taught about emotions in the first place.

From childhood onward, people are often told that certain emotions are unacceptable. Children hear messages such as “don’t be angry,” “don’t be afraid,” or “don’t be upset about that.” The lesson many people absorb is that emotions themselves are the problem. They come to view emotions as something dangerous or embarrassing that should be pushed aside.

But research on both human and animal behavior tells a very different story.

Across species, emotions are best understood as systems that organize behavior, physiology, and thought. They help individuals respond to complex situations by integrating information from many sources at once (Paul & Mendl, 2018). Emotions are part of how animals and humans prioritize goals, avoid threats, and pursue what they need in order to survive and function in their environments.

In other words, emotions are not signs of weakness or failure. They are part of the machinery that allows living organisms to adapt to the world.

Seen this way, emotions are not moral judgments. They are facts.

If a person says they feel angry, that is a fact about their internal state. Someone else might have an opinion about whether anger is appropriate in that situation, but the emotional experience itself is simply part of how the person is responding to the world around them.

This distinction is crucial. Feelings are facts. Judgments about those feelings are opinions.

Therapy operates within that distinction. When therapy is effective, the goal is usually not to argue with the facts of a person’s emotional reactions. The goal is to help them respond to those facts more effectively.

The same is true for thoughts. Thoughts and emotions are ways that individuals organize their experiences. They reflect how a person interprets and reacts to events in their environment. Therapy helps people examine those reactions and decide how they want to deal with them.

Sometimes this means learning new ways of responding to familiar feelings. Sometimes it means recognizing patterns that are no longer helpful. And over time, as people begin to handle situations differently, their emotional and cognitive reactions may gradually change as well. But that change is usually the result of new habits and new ways of engaging with life, not an attempt to deny what someone feels.

This is why therapy almost always begins with a simple requirement: identifying the facts of how someone experiences the world. Those facts include both thoughts and emotions. Without that starting point, the therapist has nothing to work with.

When people understand this, talking about emotions often becomes less intimidating. The point is not to judge them or eliminate them. The point is to recognize them as information.

And once that information is on the table, therapy can begin doing what it is actually meant to do: helping people decide what they want to do with the facts of their lives.

Paul, E. S., & Mendl, M. T. (2018). Animal emotion: Descriptive and prescriptive definitions and their implications for a comparative perspective. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 205, 202-209.

There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.

By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

© Psychology Today