"Whiplash" is a deeply researched account of the consequences of passing the Affordable Care Act.

A rising conservative movement remains in steadfast opposition to Affordable Care and expanded coverage.

For decades, conflicts about health reform have turned into “conflicts about the meaning of America itself.”

“For fifteen dizzy years, health care shot to the center of America’s partisan wars.”

“For fifteen dizzy years, health care shot to the center of America’s partisan wars.”

The issue famously hobbled the Clinton administration and became a symbol of hope or rage across the political spectrum in all the years since. Yet the real “saga began in 2009,” write public health expert David Blumenthal and political scientist James Morone in Whiplash: From the Battle for Obamacare to the War on Science, published today, when President Barack Obama “shrugged off his advisors and spent his first fourteen months in office staggering toward the reform.”

As the tawdry business of negotiating health care turned into a national ordeal, dissected for weeks on network and cable news, the process itself “got all tangled up in the country’s discord.”

The surprisingly gripping story of how, despite these odds, the Obama administration still managed to pass—then implement—most of the measures in its Affordable Care Act is the basis for Blumenthal and Morone’s far-reaching, highly significant probing of the political and cultural ructions to come. We open to the almost-immediate rise of the Tea Party, with its fixation on “death panels” and euthanasia, and close with the most recent administration’s “war on science,” with agency paralysis, mass layoffs, and canceled research blighting even pediatric oncology. It seems fair to say that the associated rancor and extremism has lasted for years, dividing Congress, parties, and the country over each associated benefit, cost, and tradeoff.

In Whiplash, an even-handed, deeply researched account of the consequences of passing the Affordable Care Act, of making health care available to millions more Americans, Blumenthal (Professor of Public Health and Health Policy at Harvard University) and Morone (John Hazen White Professor Emeritus of Political Science, Public Policy, and Urban Studies at Brown University) take us behind the scenes, to brass-knuckle drama over the new law’s passage and implementation, some of it witnessed by them personally.

There is high tension over votes and broken promises, followed by agonizing delays over the program’s exceptionally intricate website, which must be rebuilt from scratch.

There is also hand-wringing and fallout over the first 14 months of Obama’s presidency, confirmed by the “shellacking” of his first midterm. Instead of his playing to his strengths and personalizing the need for reform by focusing on America’s many bankruptcies from medical debt, Obama got lost in the weeds. He spent months wheedling out deals with media-craven opponents who promptly reneged on their promises, rushed onto partisan channels to denounce each suggested change, then stalled on votes to hold out for kickbacks. Every hard-fought “passage to 50” votes drew the country into the excruciating intricacies of floating insurance markets and expanded public options. Desperate, enraged rural voters sent ever-more extreme officials to Washington, who reassured at every turn, this “will break him. It will be his Waterloo.”

Yet even after Trump’s re-election in 2024, they were not successful. Even now, the story remains one of triumph and achievement for Obama’s Affordable Care Act—of successful passage and reform, after frustrating delays, then of a persistent failure to repeal, despite countless drawn-out attempts, costing vast amounts of funding and political capital on the other side. Whiplash also documents how the Biden administration measurably improved on several structural weaknesses in the initial program, tied to its overmodest budget. Yet, despite its own early successes, the Biden administration then failed to secure enough Democratic votes to avoid sunsetting some of the best parts of its rescue package and, as a result, lost some of its associated legacy.

“Conflicts about the meaning of America itself”

As should now be apparent from the settled dust, both Obama and Biden administrations greatly underestimated the intense undertow of anger and disaffection that each of these policy changes provided their opponents, often as manipulated bad faith, but also, with growing hostility, as community-wide fury. As one senior White House official confided in a follow-up interview, “You hear about death panels, you think, what? Are you kidding me? Death panels? They’re not going to buy that … Who would have thought those arguments would have the power they had?”

That is one of the questions to haunt Whiplash, a penetrating account of the cultural and political divisions the legislation may unwittingly have made worse: “For liberal Democrats, it was a stunning achievement—winning health care insurance, however imperfect, for most Americans. For Republicans, it was an ill-designed, unpopular law thrust upon America by an arrogant party that had misread its mandate and paid the price at the polls.”

Some of the anger at health care reform was later channeled into anti-immigrant sentiment tied to falsehoods about their associated coverage, a topic able to move opinion polls by whole percentage points. Part of the anger was also recast as fear of vaccines and their alleged adverse effects, most of which were shown to stem from the coronavirus itself, SARS-CoV-2. As elsewhere, Whiplash draws persuasive cultural patterns from partisan battles over all aspects of policy, including from the pandemic, to explain why “conflicts about health reform” have tended to “turn into conflicts about the meaning of America itself.”

Each party has its own understanding of liberty, for instance. Whereas for Democrats the term implies “freedom from want”—from, say, the unfreedom of medical debt or illness from infectious disease, for Republicans the same term suggests “freedom from others” and their associated costs or demands, including as public health restrictions. As the net effect for Republicans must occlude all economic advantages, including from a larger tax base, it seems to support their lasting reluctance to fund even the most threadbare safety net.

Helpful contrasts are likewise drawn from Trump’s first and second terms, particularly from their opposing positions on vaccines. Whereas Trump’s first administration embraced COVID-19 vaccines as likely favorable to his then-sputtering re-election campaign, to distract from his impeachment and deliver tangible results as lower weekly deaths, candidate Trump then went on to reject what Blumenthal and Morone call his greatest scientific achievement—rapid national approval and distribution of two durable vaccines, from Pfizer and Moderna. As a candidate, Trump soon joined in the tirades against public health officials, several of whom were also Democratic governors:

He blamed them for being wrong, perhaps dangerous. And he spread the angry view—already circulating on the right—to his army of followers. “Keeping healthy people at home is tyranny,” they insisted, with the President soon chiming in: “LIBERATE MINNESOTA.” Then, moments later, “LIBERATE MICHIGAN.” And finally, “LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!”

He blamed them for being wrong, perhaps dangerous. And he spread the angry view—already circulating on the right—to his army of followers. “Keeping healthy people at home is tyranny,” they insisted, with the President soon chiming in: “LIBERATE MINNESOTA.” Then, moments later, “LIBERATE MICHIGAN.” And finally, “LIBERATE VIRGINIA, and save your great 2nd Amendment. It is under siege!”

“Every success brought division”

One of the book’s most painful lessons is that political dysfunction and general ill will to science are easily drawn from constituencies that are already primed to attack federalism—particularly federal funding—as overreach. As automatically elitist and injurious, say, rather than life-saving or medically necessary.

To that end, Whiplash will inform and inspire those gearing up for the next legislative battles over coverage, access, and policy and electoral safety. Part of the challenge lies in accepting that major breakthroughs are rare, sometimes for good reasons. They incur heavy political costs, as massively increased hostility and extremism, even as they open the door to long-lasting reforms and gains for substantially more people.

Blumenthal D and Morone JA. March 24, 2026. Whiplash: From the Battle for Obamacare to the War on Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.

There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.

By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

© Psychology Today