Why Relationships Matter

Take our Can You Spot Red Flags In A Relationship?

Find a therapist to strengthen relationships

Avoiding difficult conversations doesn't preserve relationships. It damages them.

The demand-withdraw relationship pattern is strongly associated with dysfunction and health problems.

Avoidance isn't laziness or cruelty. It's usually protecting something older.

I had a client whose husband stonewalled her for seven weeks after an argument. They had kids, both worked, in one medium-sized house. But for seven weeks, he avoided her entirely. Walking past her in the halls, sleeping on the couch, and pretending everything was normal.

Surprisingly (not really), that didn't help. The couple required months of high-intensity sessions to break through not only the original pain, but the rejection and resentment caused by the avoidance itself.

Sure, you probably haven't avoided someone you live with for two months. But I'm pretty sure there are conversations you've been avoiding for at least that long.

Maybe it's the one with your partner about how the division of labor actually makes you feel. Maybe it's the one with your aging parent about their health. Maybe it's the one with your teenager about what you found on their phone. Or maybe it's the one with your closest friend, the one that risks the relationship suffering greatly.

You know the conversation. You've rehearsed it in the shower. It makes you distracted and resentful. And you haven't had it.

We've all been there.

Many people assume that avoiding hard conversations protects relationships. It doesn't. It taxes them. And like any tax left unpaid, the bill compounds. Until you pay it. And the sooner you pay, the lower the bill.

The Compound Interest of Silence

Here's what actually happens when you avoid the conversation: the issue doesn't go away. It goes underground. And underground, it grows.

You start interpreting your partner's behavior through the lens of the thing you haven't said. Small irritations become evidence. You build a case in your head that they've never been asked to defend. The emotional distance widens. Not because of a fight, but because of the absence of one.

Think about it. The distance in most struggling relationships isn't caused by what was said. It's caused by what wasn't.

Gottman's decades of research identified stonewalling as one of four communication patterns that predict divorce. Not screaming. Not fighting. Withdrawing.

A meta-analysis of 74 studies involving over 14,000 participants found that the demand-withdraw pattern, where one person tries to address an issue and the other purposefully avoids it (like my client's husband), is associated with lower relationship satisfaction, reduced intimacy, poorer communication, and increased anxiety (Schrodt, Witt, & Shimkowski, 2014).

The pattern doesn't require a crisis to do damage. It works quietly, even in relationships that look fine from the outside.

Sound familiar? Ever been surprised by a relationship breaking apart even though "they seemed totally fine at dinner last month"? It's probably this pattern imploding the connection.

The Pattern Isn't Just Romantic

This avoidance trap doesn't stop at marriage. The same mechanism shows up in every relationship where avoidance substitutes for directness—like parenting and friendships.

For example, consider the parent who won't set clear boundaries because they're afraid of their child's emotional reaction. Research shows that parents who habitually avoid conflict eventually stop setting appropriate limits, and their children develop deficits in empathy and perspective-taking that follow them into adulthood.

Why Relationships Matter

Take our Can You Spot Red Flags In A Relationship?

Find a therapist to strengthen relationships

Think about that: the kindest-seeming parenting move, avoiding a fight with their child, may be teaching your kid that discomfort is something to flee from rather than face.

Or consider the friendship where resentment builds under a layer of politeness. You absorb one too many one-sided conversations, one too many canceled plans, one too many moments where you swallowed the thing you actually wanted to say. You don't blow up. You just... pull back. And one day the friendship is hollow, and neither person can point to when it happened.

In every case, the pattern is identical: the short-term relief of not having the conversation creates long-term damage that's harder to repair than whatever you were avoiding in the first place.

Why Smart, Caring People Keep Avoiding

The standard fix is: "Just have the hard conversation. Be brave. Lean in." But if it were that simple, you'd have done it already. The fact that you haven't isn't a willpower failure. It's a signal.

Avoidance is almost always protecting something. I call that something a hook—a hidden emotional driver that makes a pattern persist even when you know it's costing you.

The hook behind conversational avoidance is usually one of these:

The belief that conflict equals rejection or failure. If you grew up in a home where disagreement meant someone left, slammed a door, or withdrew love, your nervous system learned that the price of honesty is abandonment. If you grew up in a home where no one ever fought, but silence ruled because the friction was still there, you learned this. If the marriage ended in divorce, all the more relevant. Of course you avoid conflict. The avoidance made sense, back then.

An identity built on being the easy one. The person who doesn't make waves. The partner who's "low maintenance." The friend who's "always chill." If you've been working hard to not make hard work for others your entire life, you identify as being easy—and conflict isn't easy. When your self-concept depends on being agreeable, saying the hard thing threatens who you think you are.

A nervous system trained to read silence as safety. Not a thought or decision, but a physiological state. Your body tenses before the conversation even starts, and that tension feels like proof that the conversation is dangerous. We're biologically trained to stay away from danger. You either don't have practice at walking through that fear, or when you've done it, it's been traumatic.

The behavior makes sense when you trace it back to its origin. The problem is that it doesn't serve you anymore, and you're paying the compound interest in your relationships while you protect yourself from a threat that may no longer exist.

The path forward is not to white-knuckle your way through the discomfort. That's willpower, and it doesn't work long-term for reversing any habitual pattern. The path forward is to understand the hook and then design a different response.

Three places to start:

Treat your silence as information. When you notice yourself holding something back, ask: What am I protecting right now? Not "what should I say?" That comes later. First, understand what the avoidance is doing for you. Take down some notes—what are you scared of? What does your body feel like? What is the story you're telling yourself about the worst thing that could happen (and what's the best-case alternative)?

Start with the smallest honest thing. You don't have to deliver a monologue. You don't have to solve the whole issue. Say one true sentence: "I've been holding something back," or "This thing has been bothering me, and I think you should know," or "I'm not sure how to say this, but I want to try." The first honest sentence is the hardest. Walking into the arena takes the most courage. Everything after that is just conversation.

Separate the fear from the facts. Your nervous system is telling you this conversation is dangerous. It might be wrong. Ask yourself: Is there actual evidence that this person will leave, reject, or punish me for being honest? Or is that a story from another time, running on old wiring? Most of the time, the answer is revealing. If you can, practice some breathing, and sit with the feeling of fear.

The compound interest of silence is real. But so is the relief of finally saying the thing.

The conversations you're avoiding are likely the ones your relationships need most.

So go ahead, be daring and brave.

Which one are you going to have this week?

For more on the hidden drivers behind persistent patterns, see my book Unhooked.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The Seven Principles for Making Marriage Work. New York: Crown Publishers.

Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., & Shimkowski, J. R. (2014). A meta-analytical review of the demand/withdraw pattern of interaction and its associations with individual, relational, and communicative outcomes. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 28–58.

There was a problem adding your email address. Please try again.

By submitting your information you agree to the Psychology Today Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy

© Psychology Today