The End of Western Civilization: Why the World No Longer Needs a Western Model

Western dominance is no longer a prevailing reality, yet it is invoked to sustain influence and control. Emerging civilizational models — particularly China’ — offer credible alternatives rooted in pluralism. A shift away from Western frameworks is essential for a more balanced and multipolar global order.

“We are part of one Western culture. Throughout the centuries, we have been united by the most significant connections: our shared history and traditions, from Christian faith to language and heritage; wisdom towards common descent; and sacrifices made by our forefathers for the common civilization of today” (Marco Rubio – US Secretary of State, 2026)

“We are part of one Western culture. Throughout the centuries, we have been united by the most significant connections: our shared history and traditions, from Christian faith to language and heritage; wisdom towards common descent; and sacrifices made by our forefathers for the common civilization of today” (Marco Rubio – US Secretary of State, 2026)

Such blunt statements raise several questions: why is this politicization of Western culture once again resurfacing? Why is the state, which considered itself the ‘birthplace of democracy,’ now heading towards a coercive and imperial path whereby both friends and foes are being subjugated under the pretext of so-called Western or white supremacy? The answer lies in a fact: when powerful states start weakening, they initiate civilizational debates out of anxiety and fear.

Myth of a Unified West

“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do” (Clash of Civilization – Samuel Huntington)

“The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do” (Clash of Civilization – Samuel Huntington)

The current emphasis on a unified version of the West by the Trump administration contradicts sharply with historical evidence and traditional realities. Western civilization has never been a monolithic entity; rather, it has been socially, politically, and culturally segregated. But, in modern times, these divergences and fragmentations are being portrayed to the general public as a long-consolidated history of intellectual superiority. The ‘Great Books Tradition’ is its best manifestation, whereby a complete educational curriculum, known as the ‘Canon,’ was designed to provide a foundational text shaping the so-called Western civilization.

It represents a ‘grand dialogue’ between various scholars, including Plato, Augustine, Einstein, etc., across three millennia. Through these academic developments, it has been portrayed that the West is the pinnacle of human development. This idea marginalizes significant contributions from other civilizational discourse, including ancient Chinese philosophy, mathematical innovations of ancient India, and scientific knowledge of the Islamic world. This superiority complex is grounded in conservative obsession, presenting a world order characterized by a contest between Western and other civilizations.

The western academic or cultural discourse has been designed and disseminated in a way that all other civilizational discourses are being judged critically. This universal standardization of Western civilization is, in fact, misleading and biased. Other major civilizations, such as those in India, China, the Arab world, or Africa, have also contributed in tandem or even before the Western colloquy. For instance, modern mathematics, in particular the Pythagorean Theorem, is solely associated with Western scholars. However, it was already known in China, India, and Egypt. Similarly, Metaphysics by Aristotle was rivaled by Buddhist philosophical discourse known as “Nagarjuna’s Madhyamakakarika.”

In addition, “Guanzi” and the “Discourse on Salt and Iron” were key Chinese economic texts that explained the functioning of trade and governance, even before Adam Smith’s economic model. However, the West has always painted itself as the ‘mother of reason’ or ‘nursemaid of science.’ Drawing attention to this discrimination, Edward Said, in his monumental work titled ‘Orientalism,’ clearly indicated, “The West treated non-Western societies as inferior because they needed to control them politically, culturally, and economically.” Therefore, knowledge is no longer a product of a particular civilization; instead, it has been shared throughout the world.

The World Needs a Reset

The current geopolitical situation is characterized by a global disorder where established powers, i.e., the US, are now anxious to protect their past position of eminence. From the very first day, the Trump 2.0 administration has been striving to convey a message to the entire international community that the so-called supreme Western civilization is under grave threat. Rhetoric such as immigrants taking over the natives and hatred towards foreigners is being used constantly to influence public perception, reviving the imperialist past of the West. The US National Security Strategy (NSS), released in November 2025, explicitly mentioned that the West, in particular Europe, is at the brink of ‘civilizational erasure.’ The US is trying to portray that the world requires only one dominant civilizational model to thrive and prosper. However, the question here arises: Why should the modern world rely on a single model?

“When power evades, identity takes the front seat.”

“When power evades, identity takes the front seat.”

The current multipolar world provides various civilizational frameworks that can coexist with each other, further enhancing the human intellect. Kwame Anthony Appiah, in his work Cosmopolitanism, argued, “It’s better to view cultural identities as adaptable and interdependent, allowing ideas from different backgrounds to interact with each other and challenge each other’s ideas rather than being fixed to any single model that is supreme or inflexible.” Instead of accepting the fact that civilization is a shared human achievement, the US is weaponizing it to be imposed on all other discourses. The ongoing geopolitical uncertainties are a result of this civilizational dominance. What the world got at the end was another series of regional wars that could lead to a greater catastrophe. Therefore, the upcoming world order should be characterized by a plurality of civilizational frameworks where the doors of intellect are not confined to a few.

The world is now in a phase of order transition where multiple power centers are occupying the stage. The rise of middle powers and resistance from the entire international community against civilizational subjugation have isolated the West, in particular, the US. The United States has plunged into a situation of civil disorder and violence. The country is witnessing some of the largest protests in multiple cities against the kingship of the Trump 2.0 administration. Approximately 3000 demonstrations are expected this year. Moreover, the hostilities by ICE agents and harsh immigrant policies have further exacerbated the situation. Indiscriminate killings by executive authorities are now becoming a daily routine. Attacks on synagogues and anti-Muslim incidents are increasing at an alarming rate.

“The entire empire has sunk into a quagmire of extravagance from which they cannot extricate themselves” (Liu Cixin).

“The entire empire has sunk into a quagmire of extravagance from which they cannot extricate themselves” (Liu Cixin).

The resurgence of the far-right wave in the West has resulted in civil disobedience and domestic instability. Here, the world needs to completely shift its focus from a West-originated civilizational framework to other alternatives. The PRC has long been identified as a peaceful rising power whose economic model benefits its domestic needs and provides substantial advantages to the international community. From military to economic, and cultural to academic, Beijing has provided the world with a suitable alternative to the Western model. This does not mean shifting from one dominant framework to the other; rather, it contends that the Chinese model is shaped in a way where every other civilizational framework is provided equal space to contribute to human advancement.

The very argument of saving the world through reviving Western civilization is wrong in every sense. This rhetoric is being used as a weapon by the US to preserve its declining power. From Plato to NATO, the so-called unified version of Western civilization is a myth designed to confine power to a few hands while subjugating others. From ancient Chinese to African civilizational frameworks, the world is comprised of a number of successful models that could coexist with each other. The current multipolar world order provides ample opportunity for the international community to take advantage — breaking the shackles of Western dominance to usher in a new era of progress and development.

Taut Bataut is a researcher and writer that publishes on South Asian geopolitics

Follow new articles on our Telegram channel

© New Eastern Outlook