Geoff Russ: Canada's purpose must be deeper than diverse takeout menus

Better food is no reason to support multiculturalism

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or sign-in if you have an account.

Reviews and recommendations are unbiased and products are independently selected. Postmedia may earn an affiliate commission from purchases made through links on this page.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

A nation’s highest purpose is not improving takeout menus, but you might be fooled by listening to the talk in the English-speaking world.  

British television host Piers Morgan boasts there are “a lot of white English people I would happily trade for chicken tikka masala.” South Australia’s state premier has warned that “the food would be all the same” without multiculturalism, and that he “couldn’t think of anything worse.” When did exotic food become the social contract? 

Canada in 2025 superficially resembles Canada in 2015, but it feels brittle and disjointed. Surveys now suggest most Canadians want lower immigration levels and want newcomers to adopt our customs instead of living apart in cultural enclaves. In other words, they want them to assimilate, and with good reason. 

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Interested in more newsletters? Browse here.

The French sociologist Émile Durkheim argued that when people gather around shared religious rituals and symbols, they generate “